...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives and manuscripts >Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings, Radical Histories Review Special Issue
【24h】

Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings, Radical Histories Review Special Issue

机译:衡量档案:历史挖掘,根治历史审查特别问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editors Daniel Marshall, Kevin P Murphy and Zeb Tortorici's introduction to Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings posits that 'in a catalog of queer archives you can find not only a listing of current gay and lesbian archives around the world but also a listing of those gay and lesbian archives that "no longer exist" and, most bewitchingly, a listing of those archives that "never existed'" (p. 1). The Foucauldian conception of the archive proposed in The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969), as not a body of documentary evidence nor the institutions that act as its custodian but 'the law of what can be said, the system that governs the appearance of statements as unique events' (p. 129), is used as both a touchstone and a problematic in this volume. This special issue of Radical Histories Review explores the ways in which LGBTQIA history and experience have been and continue to be negated or silenced by archival institutions, and ways in which we may reimagine archival hegemony to better encompass voices from the margins.
机译:编辑Daniel Marshall,Kevin P Murphy和Zeb Tortorici介绍了衡量纪念档案:历史挖掘出来的位置'在Queer Archives目录中,您不仅可以找到世界各地当前同性恋和女同性恋档案的列表,还可以找到那些同性恋的上市女同性恋档案“不再存在”,最令人养成的档案,那些“从不存在”的档案列表(第1页)。关于知识考古学(1969年)提出的档案馆的Foucauldian概念(1969年),不是一个文件证据的机构,也不是其托管人的机构,而是“可以说的法律,这是治理陈述外表的制度独特的事件'(第129页),用作本卷中的Touchstone和问题。这一特别问题的激进历史审查探讨了LGBTQIA历史和经验的方式,并继续被档案机构否定或沉默,以及我们可以重新称赞担任归档霸权以更好地涵盖利润率的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号