...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives and manuscripts >Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings, Radical Histories Review Special Issue
【24h】

Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings, Radical Histories Review Special Issue

机译:存档档案:历史解开,激进历史回顾特刊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editors Daniel Marshall, Kevin P Murphy and Zeb Tortorici's introduction to Queering Archives: Historical Unravellings posits that 'in a catalog of queer archives you can find not only a listing of current gay and lesbian archives around the world but also a listing of those gay and lesbian archives that "no longer exist" and, most bewitchingly, a listing of those archives that "never existed'" (p. 1). The Foucauldian conception of the archive proposed in The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969), as not a body of documentary evidence nor the institutions that act as its custodian but 'the law of what can be said, the system that governs the appearance of statements as unique events' (p. 129), is used as both a touchstone and a problematic in this volume. This special issue of Radical Histories Review explores the ways in which LGBTQIA history and experience have been and continue to be negated or silenced by archival institutions, and ways in which we may reimagine archival hegemony to better encompass voices from the margins.
机译:编辑丹尼尔·马歇尔(Daniel Marshall),凯文·普·墨菲(Kevin P Murphy)和泽布·托托里奇(Zeb Tortorici)对《 Queering档案馆:历史解开》的介绍认为,“在同志档案馆的目录中,您不仅可以找到世界各地当前的同性恋档案馆清单,还可以找到那些同性恋档案馆的清单。 “不再存在”的女同性恋档案,以及最令人神往的是“从未存在”的档案列表(第1页)。知识考古学(1969)中提出的Fouculdian档案概念,既不是文件证据的主体,也不是作为其保管人的机构,而是“可以说的法律”,它控制陈述的外观。唯一事件”(第129页)在本卷中既用作试金石,又用作有问题的书籍。本期《激进历史评论》特刊探讨了档案机构对LGBTQIA历史和经验的看法,并将继续予以否定或沉默,以及我们可能如何重新构想档案霸权,以更好地包容边缘人士的声音。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号