...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Psychology >What's in it for Me? Motivational Differences between Farmers' Subsidised and Non-Subsidised Conservation Practices
【24h】

What's in it for Me? Motivational Differences between Farmers' Subsidised and Non-Subsidised Conservation Practices

机译:对我有什么用?农民补贴和非补贴养护方式的动机差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Through nature conservation practices, farmers can strongly enhance nature quality and biodiversity in rural areas. In this paper, the social psychological underpinnings of farmers' nature conservation practices are investigated using the Theory of Planned Behavior, to which the concepts of self-identity and personal norms were added. A distinction is made between nature conservation practices done on a non-subsidised basis and nature conservation practices for which farmers receive some form of remuneration from the Dutch government. Eighty-five arable farmers participated in our survey. Results show that our model explains more variance in the intention to perform non-subsidised than subsidised nature conservation practices. Also, the concepts of self-identity and personal norms appear to be related to the intention to perform non-subsidised, not subsidised conservation.
机译:通过自然保护实践,农民可以大大提高农村地区的自然质量和生物多样性。本文利用计划行为理论研究了农民自然保护实践的社会心理基础,并在此基础上增加了自我认同和个人规范的概念。在非补贴的自然保护措施和自然保护措施之间有所区别,农民从荷兰政府那里获得某种形式的报酬。八十五名可耕农民参加了我们的调查。结果表明,我们的模型解释了在执行非补贴的意图方面比在补贴的自然保护实践中存在更多差异。同样,自我认同和个人规范的概念似乎与进行非补贴而不是补贴的保护的意图有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号