首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach
【24h】

Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach

机译:使用生命周期共同效益评估和系统动力学方法进行可持续能源发展的成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A novel Air Resource Co-benefits model was developed to estimate the social benefits of a Sustainable Energy Policy, involving both renewable energy (RE) and energy efficiency improvements (EEI). The costs and benefits of the policy during 2010-2030 were quantified. A system dynamics model was constructed to simulate the amount of energy saving under the scenario of promoting both RE and EEI. The life-cycle co-reductions of five criteria pollutants (PM_(10), SO_2, NO_x, CO, and ozone) and greenhouse gas are estimated by assuming coal fired as marginal electricity suppliers. Moreover, a concise life table approach was developed to estimate averted years of life lost (YOLL). The results showed that YOIX totaling 0.11-0.21 years (41-78 days) per capita, or premature deaths totaling 126,507-251,169, is expected to be averted during 2010-2030 under the RE plus EEI scenario. Specifically, because of the higher investment cost, the benefit-cost ratio of 1.9-2.1 under the EEI scenario is lower than the 7.2-7.9 under the RE scenario. This difference reveals that RE is more socially beneficial than EEI. The net benefit of the RE and EEI scenarios during 2010-2030 totaled approximately US$ 5,972-6,893 per person or US$ 170-190 per MW h. To summarize, this study presents a new approach to estimate averted YOLL, and finds that the health benefits can justify the compliance costs associated with the Sustainable Energy Policy.
机译:开发了一种新颖的空气资源共收益模型来估算可持续能源政策的社会效益,其中涉及可再生能源(RE)和能效改进(EEI)。量化了2010-2030年该政策的成本和收益。建立了系统动力学模型,以模拟在促进可再生能源和可再生能源发展的情况下的节能量。通过假设燃煤为边际电力供应商,估算了五种标准污染物(PM_(10),SO_2,NO_x,CO和臭氧)和温室气体的生命周期共减少量。此外,开发了一种简洁的生命表方法来估计避免的生命损失年限(YOLL)。结果表明,在RE加上EEI的情况下,预计在2010-2030年期间将避免人均YOIX总计0.11-0.21年(41-78天),或总计126,507-251,169的过早死亡。具体而言,由于投资成本较高,EEI方案下的收益成本比为1.9-2.1,低于RE方案下的收益成本比7.2-7.9。这种差异表明,RE比EEI在社会上更有利。 RE和EEI情景在2010-2030年期间的净收益总计约为每人5,972-6,893美元或每兆瓦时170-190美元。总而言之,本研究提出了一种新方法来估算避免的YOLL,并发现健康益处可以证明与可持续能源政策相关的合规成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2014年第15期|57-66|共10页
  • 作者

    Yi-Hsuan Shih; Chao-Heng Tseng;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, No. I, Sec. 3, Chung-Hsiao E. Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan, Republic of China;

    Institute of Environmental Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, No. I, Sec. 3, Chung-Hsiao E. Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan, Republic of China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Co-benefits; System dynamics; Energy efficiency; Renewable energy; Learning curve;

    机译:共同利益;系统动力学;能源效率;再生能源;学习曲线;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号