首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy >Feasibility of contracting for medication therapy management services in a physician's office
【24h】

Feasibility of contracting for medication therapy management services in a physician's office

机译:在医生办公室签订药物治疗管理服务的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose. The feasibility of contracting for medication therapy management (MTM) services in a physician's office was studied.rnMethods. Patient records from January to June 2007 were reviewed at a university-based family medicine clinic to identify patients eligible for MTM services. Inclusion criteria included a minimum of six long-term medications and three chronic diseases. If eligible for MTM services, the patient's primary pharmacy was contacted to determine in which Medicare prescription drug plan (MPDP) the patient was enrolled. Each MPDP was then contacted to establish a contract for compensation for face-to-face encounters by a pharmacist. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 832 patients with Medicare Part B coverage were identified, and 404 charts were randomly selected for review. Of the 404 charts reviewed, 208 patients met the inclusion criteria. MPDP information was obtained for 185 patients.rnPatients were taking a mean ± S.D. of 8.6 ± 2.4 medications. Patients' most common diseases included hypertension, hyperlipi-demia, diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and arthritis. A total of 185 patients were enrolled in 20 MPDPs. Of those plans, 6 (30%) provided MTM services through internal drug plan staff to 80 (43%) of the patients reviewed. No information regarding MTM services was available from 13 (65%) of the 20 MPDPs. One MPDP (5%) provided MTM through face-to-face encounters; however, this MPDP contracted with only the dispensing pharmacy, not individual pharmacists.rnConclusion. Over a six-month time period, pharmacists in a family medicine practice were unable to receive compensation by Medicare for providing MTM services.
机译:目的。研究了在医生办公室签订药物治疗管理(MTM)服务的可行性。方法2007年1月至2007年6月的患者记录在一家大学的家庭医学诊所进行了审查,以识别符合MTM服务条件的患者。入选标准包括至少六种长期药物和三种慢性病。如果有资格获得MTM服务,则联系患者的主要药房以确定患者参加了哪个Medicare处方药计划(MPDP)。然后,与每个MPDP联系,以建立针对药剂师面对面接触的补偿合同。使用描述性统计数据分析数据。结果。总共确定了832名Medicare B部分承保范围的患者,并随机选择404张图表进行审查。在所审查的404张图表中,有208位患者符合纳入标准。获得了185例患者的MPDP信息.rnn患者的平均值为±S.D. 8.6±2.4种药物。患者最常见的疾病包括高血压,高脂血症,糖尿病,胃食管反流病和关节炎。总共185名患者参加了20个MPDP。在这些计划中,有6名(30%)通过内部药物计划人员为80名(43%)的患者提供了MTM服务。 20个MPDP中的13个(65%)没有有关MTM服务的信息。一个MPDP(5%)通过面对面的交流提供了MTM;但是,该MPDP仅与配药药房签约,而不与个别药师签约。在六个月的时间内,家庭医学执业的药剂师因提供MTM服务而无法获得Medicare的赔偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号