首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment
【24h】

Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment

机译:政府支出中的主动和被动浪费:来自政策实验的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We propose a distinction between active and passive waste as determinants of the cost of public services. Active waste entails utility for the public decision maker, whereas passive waste does not. We analyze purchases of standardized goods by Italian public bodies and exploit a policy experiment associated with a national procurement agency. We find that: (ⅰ) some public bodies pay systematically more than others for equivalent goods; (ⅱ) differences are correlated with governance structure; (ⅲ) the variation in prices is principally due to variation in passive rather than active waste; and (ⅳ) passive waste accounts for 83 percent of total estimated waste.
机译:我们建议在主动和被动浪费之间做出区分,以决定公共服务的成本。主动废物需要公共决策者使用,而被动废物则不需要。我们分析意大利公共机构对标准化商品的购买,并利用与国家采购机构相关的政策实验。我们发现:(ⅰ)一些公共机构有系统地为同等商品支付更多的费用; (ⅱ)差异与治理结构相关; (ⅲ)价格变化主要是由于被动废物而不是主动废物的变化; (ⅳ)被动废弃物占估计废弃物总量的83%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2009年第4期|1278-1308|共31页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;

    Department of Economics, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK;

    Business School, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK Department of Economics, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata';

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号