首页> 外文OA文献 >Active and passive waste in government spending: evidence from a policy experiment
【2h】

Active and passive waste in government spending: evidence from a policy experiment

机译:政府支出中的主动和被动浪费:政策实验的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We propose a distinction between active and passive waste as determinants of the cost of public services. Active waste entails utility for the public decision maker, whereas passive waste does not. We analyze purchases of standardized goods by Italian public bodies and exploit a policy experiment associated with a national procurement agency. We find that: (i) some public bodies pay systematically more than others for equivalent goods; (ii) differences are correlated with governance structure; (iii) the variation in prices is principally date to variation in passive rather than active waste; and (iv) passive waste accounts for 83 percent of total estimated waste. (JEL H11, H57, H83)
机译:我们建议在主动和被动浪费之间做出区分,以决定公共服务的成本。主动废物需要公共决策者使用,而被动废物则不需要。我们分析意大利公共机构对标准化商品的购买,并利用与国家采购机构相关的政策实验。我们发现:(i)一些公共机构比其他公共机构有系统地为同等商品支付更多费用; (ii)差异与治理结构相关; (iii)价格变化主要是被动废物而非主动废物变化的日期; (iv)被动废弃物占估计废弃物总量的83%。 (JEL H11,H57,H83)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号