首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: not for all patients not for all surgeons not in all centres
【2h】

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis: not for all patients not for all surgeons not in all centres

机译:腹腔镜粘连溶解术:不适用于所有患者也不适用于所有外科医生也不适用于所有中心

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ASBO is a common cause of emergency surgery and the use of laparoscopy for the treatment of these patients is still under debate and conflicting results have been published, in particular regarding the high risk of iatrogenic bowel injury. In fact, although over the last few years there has been an increasing enthusiasm in the surgical community about the advantages and potential better outcomes of laparoscopic management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), recently published studies have introduced a significant word of caution. From 2011 in our centre, we have started to systematically approach ASBO in carefully selected patients with a step-by-step standardized laparoscopic procedure, developed and performed by a single operator experienced in emergency laparoscopy, collecting data in a prospective database. Inclusion criteria were: stable patients (without diffuse peritonitis and/or septic shock with suspicion of bowel perforation), CT scan findings consistent with a clear transition point and therefore suspected to have a single obstructing adhesive band. Patients with diffuse SB distension in the absence of a well-defined transition point and suspected to have diffuse matted adhesions (based on their surgical history and radiological findings) should be initially managed conservatively, including gastrografin challenge. Up to date, 83 patients were enrolled in the study. The rate of iatrogenic full-thickness bowel injury was 4/83 (4.8%); two of these cases were managed with simple repair and the other two required bowel resection and anastomosis. Conversion to open was performed in 3/4 of these cases, whereas in one a repair of the full-thickness injury was completed laparoscopically. All the iatrogenic injuries were detected intraoperatively and none of the reoperations that occurred in this series were due to missed bowel injuries. At 30 days follow-up, none reported incisional hernias or SSI or death. With the described accurate selection of patients, the use of such standardized step-by-step technique and in the presence of dedicated operating surgeons with advanced emergency surgery laparoscopic expertise, such procedure can be safe and feasible with multiple advantages in terms of morbidity and LOS. A careful preoperative selection of those patients who might be best candidates for laparoscopic adhesiolysis is needed. The level of laparoscopic expertise can also be highly variable, and not having advanced surgical expertise in the specific subspecialty of emergency laparoscopy, ultimately resulting in performing standardized procedures with proper careful and safe step-by-step technique, is highly recommended.
机译:ASBO是急诊手术的常见原因,腹腔镜治疗这些患者的治疗仍在争论中,并且已经发表了相互矛盾的结果,尤其是关于医源性肠损伤的高风险。实际上,尽管在过去的几年中,外科界对腹腔镜粘连性小肠梗阻(ASBO)的优势和潜在更好的治疗效果抱有越来越高的热情,但最近发表的研究提出了重要的警告。从2011年起,我们在中心开始采用逐步标准化的腹腔镜手术方法,对经过精心挑选的患者进行ASBO治疗,该方法由一名经验丰富的紧急腹腔镜手术操作者开发和执行,并在前瞻性数据库中收集数据。入选标准为:稳定的患者(无弥漫性腹膜炎和/或怀疑肠穿孔的脓毒性休克),CT扫描发现与明确的过渡点一致,因此被怀疑具有单一阻塞性胶粘带。 SB弥漫性弥漫性疾病的患者,如果没有明确的过渡点,并且怀疑弥散性粘连(根据其手术史和影像学发现),应首先进行保守治疗,包括胃泌素攻击。迄今为止,已有83名患者参加了研究。医源性全层肠损伤率为4/83(4.8%);这些病例中有2例通过简单的修复进行处理,另外2例需要进行肠切除和吻合术。在这种情况的3/4中,转换为开放性,而在一种情况下,通过腹腔镜完成了全层损伤的修复。术中检测到所有医源性损伤,该系列中没有发生因漏肠而引起的再次手术。随访30天,均未报告切口疝或SSI或死亡。有了所描述的准确选择患者的方法,使用这种标准化的逐步技术以及在拥有高级急诊手术腹腔镜专业知识的专门手术医生的陪伴下,这样的手术既安全又可行,在发病率和LOS方面具有多重优势。需要仔细选择可能最适合腹腔镜粘连的患者。腹腔镜专业知识的水平也可能变化很大,并且强烈建议在紧急腹腔镜检查的特定亚专业中不具备先进的外科专业知识,从而最终通过适当的谨慎和安全的逐步操作技术来执行标准化程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号