首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >My right-hand man versus We barely make use of them: change leaders talking about educational scientists in curriculum change processes—a Membership Categorization Analysis
【2h】

My right-hand man versus We barely make use of them: change leaders talking about educational scientists in curriculum change processes—a Membership Categorization Analysis

机译:我的得力助手与我们几乎没有利用它们:变革领导者在课程变革过程中谈论教育科学家—成员分类分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Health professions education scholarship units (HPESUs) are increasingly becoming a standard for medical schools worldwide without having much information about their value and role in actual educational practices, particularly of those who work in these units, the educational scientists. We conducted a linguistic analysis, called Membership Categorization Analysis, of interviews with leaders of recent curriculum changes to explore how they talk about educational scientists in relation to these processes. The analysis was conducted on previously collected interview data with nine change leaders of major undergraduate medical curriculum change processes in the Netherlands. We analyzed how change leaders categorize HPESUs and educational scientists (use of category terms) and what they say about them (predicates). We noticed two ways of categorizing educational scientists, with observable different predicates. Educational scientists categorized by their first name were suggested to be closer to the change process, more involved in decisional practices and positively described, whereas those described in more generic terms were represented in terms of relatively passive and unspecified activities, were less explicit referenced for their knowledge and expertise and were predominantly factually or negatively described. This study shows an ambiguous portrayal of educational scientists by leaders of major curriculum change processes. Medical schools are challenged to establish medical curricula in consultation with a large, diverse and interdisciplinary stakeholder group. We suggest that it is important to invest in interpersonal relationships to strengthen the internal collaborations and make sure people are aware of each other’s existence and roles in the process of curriculum development.
机译:卫生专业教育奖学金单位(HPESU)越来越成为世界范围内医学院校的标准,却没有太多关于其在实际教育实践中的价值和作用的信息,特别是在这些部门工作的教育科学家中。我们对最近课程改革的领导者进行了一次语言分析,称为成员资格分类分析,以探讨他们如何谈论与这些过程有关的教育科学家。该分析是根据先前收集的访谈数据与荷兰主要的本科医学课程变更流程的九名变更负责人进行的。我们分析了变革领袖如何对HPESU和教育科学家进行分类(使用类别术语)以及他们对他们的看法(谓词)。我们注意到可以用不同的谓词对教育科学家进行分类的两种方法。建议按姓氏分类的教育科学家更接近变革过程,更多地参与决策实践并得到正面描述,而那些以较笼统的术语描述的则以相对被动和未指定的活动为代表,因此对它们的引用较少知识和专业知识,主要是事实或否定的描述。这项研究显示了主要课程变更过程的领导者对教育科学家的模棱两可的描绘。医学院应与大型,多元化和跨学科的利益相关者团体协商,制定医学课程。我们建议对人际关系进行投资以加强内部协作,并确保人们在课程开发过程中意识到彼此的存在和作用,这一点很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号