首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations
【2h】

Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations

机译:出售信托吗?财务补偿对修复基于能力和诚信的信任冲突的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the popularity of financial compensation as a means for addressing trust violations, the question whether (more) money can indeed buy trust back remains largely unexplored. In the present research, we focus on the role of violation type and compensation size. The results of a scenario study and a laboratory experiment show that financial compensation can effectively promote the restoration of trust for transgressions that indicate a lack of competence. Conversely, for transgressions which signal a lack of integrity, financial compensation is not an effective tool to repair trust. Moreover, our findings indicate that for both violation types, overcompensation has no positive effects on top of the impact of equal compensation. These findings therefore show that when it comes to trust, money cannot buy everything.
机译:尽管金融补偿已成为解决违反信任行为的一种手段,但(更多)金钱是否确实可以回购信任这一问题仍未得到充分探讨。在本研究中,我们着重研究违规类型和赔偿金额的作用。方案研究和实验室实验的结果表明,财务补偿可以有效地促进对表明缺乏能力的过犯的信任的恢复。相反,对于表明缺乏正直行为的违法行为,财务补偿并不是修复信任的有效工具。而且,我们的研究结果表明,对于两种违规类型,过度补偿对平等补偿的影响都没有积极影响。因此,这些发现表明,在信任方面,金钱无法购买一切。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号