首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience >Selection of the Best Electroencephalogram Channel to Predict the Depth of Anesthesia
【2h】

Selection of the Best Electroencephalogram Channel to Predict the Depth of Anesthesia

机译:选择最佳脑电图通道来预测麻醉深度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Precise cerebral dynamics of action of the anesthetics are a challenge for neuroscientists. This explains why there is no gold standard for monitoring the Depth of Anesthesia (DoA) and why experimental studies may use several electroencephalogram (EEG) channels, ranging from 2 to 128 EEG-channels. Our study aimed at finding the scalp area providing valuable information about brain activity under general anesthesia (GA) to select the more optimal EEG channel to characterized the DoA. We included 30 patients undergoing elective, minor surgery under GA and used a 32-channel EEG to record their electrical brain activity. In addition, we recorded their physiological parameters and the BIS monitor. Each individual EEG channel data were processed to test their ability to differentiate awake from asleep states. Due to strict quality criteria adopted for the EEG data and the difficulties of the real-life setting of the study, only 8 patients recordings were taken into consideration in the final analysis. Using 2 classification algorithms, we identified the optimal channels to discriminate between asleep and awake states: the frontal and temporal F8 and T7 were retrieved as being the two bests channels to monitor DoA. Then, using only data from the F8 channel, we tried to minimize the number of features required to discriminate between the awake and asleep state. The best algorithm turned out to be the Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB) requiring only 5 features (Area Under the ROC Curve - AUC- of 0.93 ± 0.04). This finding may pave the way to improve the assessment of DoA by combining one EEG channel recordings with a multimodal physiological monitoring of the brain state under GA. Further work is needed to see if these results may be valid to asses the depth of sedation in ICU.
机译:麻醉药作用的精确大脑动力学对神经科学家是一个挑战。这就解释了为什么没有监测麻醉深度(DoA)的黄金标准,以及为什么实验研究可能会使用2到128个EEG通道的几个脑电图(EEG)通道。我们的研究旨在发现头皮区域,提供有关全麻(GA)下脑部活动的有价值的信息,以选择更理想的EEG通道来表征DoA。我们纳入了30例接受GA择期小手术的患者,并使用32通道EEG记录其脑电活动。此外,我们记录了它们的生理参数和BIS监视器。处理每个单独的EEG通道数据以测试其区分清醒状态与睡眠状态的能力。由于针对EEG数据采用了严格的质量标准,并且研究的实际设置存在困难,因此在最终分析中仅考虑了8位患者的记录。使用2种分类算法,我们确定了区分睡眠状态和清醒状态的最佳通道:额叶和颞部F8和T7被检索为监测DoA的两个最佳通道。然后,仅使用来自F8通道的数据,我们尝试将区分唤醒状态和睡眠状态所需的功能数量减至最少。最好的算法原来是高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB),它仅需要5个特征(ROC曲线下的面积-AUC-为0.93±0.04)。这一发现可能通过将一个EEG通道记录与GA下大脑状态的多模式生理监测相结合,为改善DoA评估铺平了道路。需要进一步的工作,以查看这些结果是否可能有效评估ICU中的镇静深度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号