首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cardiology Cases >Aortic dissection albeit negative d-dimers and zero clinical probability – Another facet of medicines deadly chameleon
【2h】

Aortic dissection albeit negative d-dimers and zero clinical probability – Another facet of medicines deadly chameleon

机译:主动脉夹层尽管d-二聚体阴性且临床可能性为零-医学致命变色龙的另一个方面

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aortic dissection, the rupture of the aorta's intimal and medial layers, leading to the formation of a false lumen, is a relatively common disease with high mortality. So far, while not addressing penetrating aortic ulcer or intramural hematoma, current guidelines take a negative value for d-dimers for a sufficient method to rule out aortic dissection in patients with a low clinical probability, as calculated by the ADD risk score. We present two cases of patients with acute aortic dissection, albeit presenting with a low clinical probability for acute aortic dissection and negative values for d-dimers.<>Learning objective: One must entertain a high level of suspicion for acute aortic syndrome as even laboratory results within the normal range of d-dimers connected with a low clinical probability can be misleading. According to the patient's symptoms, a battery of different diagnostic tools should play in concert, including imaging studies, repeat clinical evaluation, and repeat laboratory tests, such as d-dimers, before dismissing a diagnosis as severe as aortic dissection.>
机译:主动脉夹层是主动脉内膜和中间层的破裂,导致假管腔的形成,是一种相对常见的高死亡率疾病。到目前为止,虽然尚不能解决穿透性主动脉溃疡或壁内血肿,但目前的指南对d-二聚体取负值,以作为一种充分的方法来排除临床可能性较低的主动脉夹层,该方法由ADD风险评分计算得出。我们介绍了2例急性主动脉夹层患者,尽管急性主动脉夹层的临床可能性较低且d-dimers值为负。 strong>学习目标:其中一个必须引起高度怀疑急性主动脉综合征,即使在正常的d-二聚体范围内的实验室结果与较低的临床概率也可能会产生误导。根据患者的症状,在排除严重如主动脉夹层的诊断之前,应配合使用各种不同的诊断工具,包括影像学研究,重复临床评估和重复实验室检查,例如d-二聚体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号