首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Comparison of Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Lesions
【2h】

Comparison of Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Malignant Breast Lesions

机译:超声检查与细针穿刺细胞学检查在乳腺恶性病变诊断中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer of women worldwide and usually presents as lump in the breast. Ultrasonography and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) are two investigational tools often used to differentiate malignant breast lump from benign one.>Aims and Objects: To find out and compare the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC in diagnosing malignant breast lump.>Material and Methods: Patients who presented with clinically palpable breast lump at the department of Surgery, RIMS, India, from September, 2010 to August, 2012, were included. Recurrent lumps, breast abscess and cystic breast lumps were excluded. All the patients underwent Ultrasonographic evaluation using 7.5 MHz probe (©SIEMENS, Sonoline Versa Plus) at the department of Radiodiagnosis, RIMS and FNAC at the department of Pathology, RIMS. All the patients underwent excision of the lumps and tissues were sent for Histopathological examination. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC were calculated taking Histopathological result as the gold standard. Values were compared.>Results: Sixty patients with 62 breast lumps (40 benign and 22 malignant) were included. FNAC reported 42 lumps as benign and 19 as malignant and was indeterminate in 1 case. Ultrasonography reported 36 cases as benign, 18 as malignant and 6 as indeterminate; it failed to detect breast lump in 2 cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasonography and FNAC in diagnosing malignant breast lump were respectively 94.74%, 100%, 100%, 97.22% and 90.48%, 100%, 100%, 95.24%.>Conclusion: Ultrasonography and FNAC are 100% specific in diagnosing malignant breast lesion. Although Ultrasonography appears more sensitive than FNAC, the percentage of indeterminate report is higher with Ultrasonography.
机译:>简介:乳腺癌是全世界女性最常见的癌症,通常表现为乳房肿块。超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是经常用于区分恶性乳腺肿块与良性乳房肿块的两种研究工具。 FNAC在诊断恶性乳腺肿块中。>材料和方法:从2010年9月至2012年8月在印度RIMS的外科接受临床可触及的乳腺肿块的患者包括在内。排除了复发性肿块,乳房脓肿和囊性乳房肿块。所有患者均在RIMS放射诊断科和RIMS病理科使用7.5 MHz探头(©SIEMENS,Sonoline Versa Plus)进行超声检查。所有患者均切除了肿块和组织,并进行了组织病理学检查。以组织病理学结果为金标准,计算超声和FNAC的敏感性,特异性和预测值。比较值。>结果:纳入60例62例乳腺肿块(良性40例,恶性22例)。 FNAC报告为良性肿块42例,恶性肿瘤19例,不确定1例。超声检查报告36例为良性,18例为恶性,6例不确定。 2例均未发现乳房肿块。超声和FNAC在诊断乳腺肿块中的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值分别为94.74%,100%,100%,97.22%和90.48%,100%,100%,95.24%。>结论:< / strong>超声检查和FNAC在诊断恶性乳腺病变方面具有100%的特异性。尽管超声检查似乎比FNAC更敏感,但是超声检查的不确定报告百分比更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号