首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass Assessment: Correlation between 2D-Derived Linear Dimensions and 3-Dimensional Automated Machine Learning-Based Methods in Unselected Patients
【2h】

Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass Assessment: Correlation between 2D-Derived Linear Dimensions and 3-Dimensional Automated Machine Learning-Based Methods in Unselected Patients

机译:超声心动图左心室质量评估:2D衍生的线性尺寸与三维自动化在未选择患者中的基于机器学习的方法之间的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A recently developed algorithm for 3D analysis based on machine learning (ML) principles detects left ventricular (LV) mass without any human interaction. We retrospectively studied the correlation between 2D-derived linear dimensions using the ASE/EACVI-recommended formula and 3D automated, ML-based methods (Philips HeartModel) regarding LV mass quantification in unselected patients undergoing echocardiography. We included 130 patients (mean age 60 ± 18 years; 45% women). There was only discrete agreement between 2D and 3D measurements of LV mass (r = 0.662, r2 = 0.348, p < 0.001). The automated algorithm yielded an overestimation of LV mass compared to the linear method (Bland–Altman positive bias of 13.1 g with 95% limits of the agreement at 4.5 to 21.6 g, p = 0.003, ICC 0.78 (95%CI 0.68−8.4). There was a significant proportional bias (Beta −0.22, t = −2.9) p = 0.005, the variance of the difference varied across the range of LV mass. When the published cut-offs for LV mass abnormality were used, the observed proportion of overall agreement was 77% (kappa = 0.32, p < 0.001). In consecutive patients undergoing echocardiography for any indications, LV mass assessment by 3D analysis using a novel ML-based algorithm showed systematic differences and wide limits of agreements compared with quantification by ASE/EACVI- recommended formula when the current cut-offs and partition values were applied.
机译:基于机器学习(ML)原理的最近开发的3D分析算法检测左心室(LV)质量而没有任何人的相互作用。我们回顾性地研究了使用关于未选择性患者的ISSE / EACVI推荐的公式和基于LV质量定量的基于LV质量定量的ASE / EACVI推荐的公式和3D自动化的线性尺寸之间的相关性。我们包括130名患者(平均年龄为60±18岁;妇女45%)。仅在2D和3D测量值之间的离散协议,LV质量(r = 0.662,R2 = 0.348,P <0.001)。与线性方法相比,自动化算法产生了LV质量的高估(Bland-Altman阳性偏差为13.1克,在4.5至21.6g的情况下,P = 0.003,ICC 0.78(95%CI 0.68-8.4) 。有显着的比例偏差(Beta -0.22,T = -2.9)p = 0.005,差异的变化在LV质量范围内变化。当使用出版的LV质量异常的截止,观察到的比例总体协议为77%(KAPPA = 0.32,P <0.001)。在接受超声心动图的患者中进行任何适应症,使用新颖的ML的算法进行3D分析的LV大规模评估显示系统差异和与量化相比的各种协议的差异很大ASE / EACVI推荐的公式应用当前截止和分区值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号