首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >From the American Board of Family Medicine: PURSUING PRACTICAL PROFESSIONALISM: FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION
【2h】

From the American Board of Family Medicine: PURSUING PRACTICAL PROFESSIONALISM: FORM FOLLOWS FUNCTION

机译:来自美国家庭医学委员会:追求实用专业:表格跟进功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Still early in a long game of delivery system transformation, the United States is already experiencing some of the negative consequences of pursuing quality and value measurement on professionalism in health care, specifically in the form of provider burnout. Other countries have struggled with similar endeavors, including the United Kingdom, which in 2004 launched an important experiment in value-base payment called the Quality and Outcomes Framework, or the QOF (“Qwaf”). The QOF increased primary care payments by up to 25% depending on how physicians did on more than 120 measures. The QOF was associated with improvements in several measures similar to those used currently in the United States such as smoking status, blood pressure control, and cholesterol management for patients with coronary heart disease or prior stroke. Improvement was directly aligned with incentives for when 12 measures were removed from the incentive list, there was significant erosion of previous improvement. The QOF was also associated with reductions in patient-centered outcomes, like continuity, and with increased physician burnout. In fact, one of the lessons from the QOF is that, “aligning financial incentives with professional values may reduce the risk of unintended consequences.” Scotland abandoned the QOF in 2016 and England reduced the number of QOF measures by one-third while also substantially reducing its role in physician income. As the United Kingdom was backing away from its pay-for-performance scheme, the United States launched the Quality Payment Program, without attending or adapting to the valuable lessons that the United Kingdom offered. Specifically, the United States failed to align these potent drivers of behavior with clinicians’ intrinsic motivations to deliver good care. Below, we review how such alignment might galvanize a new era of practical professionalism, by using policies that purposefully harness lessons from behavioral economics and principals derived from systems engineering. In doing so, we propose the creation of a built environment for health care in which delivering good, cost-effective care is not only the easy choice but one that supports professionalism and joy.
机译:仍然在交付系统转型漫长的游戏初期,美国已经经历了对医疗保健专业化进行质量和价值衡量的一些负面后果,特别是以提供商精疲力尽的形式。其他国家也在类似的努力中挣扎,包括英国。英国在2004年启动了一项基于价值的支付的重要实验,称为“质量和成果框架”,即QOF(“ Qwaf”)。 QOF最多提高25%的基层医疗费用,具体取决于医生对120多种措施的处理方式。 QOF与一些与美国目前使用的措施类似的措施相关,例如吸烟状况,血压控制和冠心病或先前卒中患者的胆固醇管理。改进与激励直接相关,因为当从激励清单中删除12项措施时,以前的改进会受到严重侵蚀。 QOF还与以患者为中心的结局减少(例如连续性)以及医生的倦怠增加有关。实际上,QOF的经验教训之一是,“使财务激励与专业价值观保持一致可以减少意外后果的风险。”苏格兰在2016年放弃了QOF,英格兰将QOF措施的数量减少了三分之一,同时也大大降低了其在医师收入中的作用。当英国退出按绩效支付计划时,美国启动了质量支付计划,而没有参加或适应英国提供的宝贵经验。具体来说,美国未能将这些强有力的行为驱动因素与临床医生提供良好护理的内在动机相结合。下面,我们通过使用有目的地利用行为经济学的教训和系统工程学的原理的政策,回顾这种契合如何激发新的实践专业时代。为此,我们建议创建一个健康的医疗环境,在该环境中,提供优质,经济高效的护理不仅是轻松的选择,而且是一种支持专业精神和喜悦的环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号