首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Validity of a Holistically Scored Retell Protocol for Determining the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students
【2h】

The Validity of a Holistically Scored Retell Protocol for Determining the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students

机译:全面评定的Retell议定书的有效性用于确定中学生阅读理解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study, the authors examined the validity of a holistically scored retell within a confirmatory factor analysis framework by comparing the fit of a three-factor model of reading with the data from a diverse sample of seventh and eighth graders. The final model demonstrated adequate fit, χ2(32) = 97.316; comparative fit index = .96; Tucker–Lewis index = .94; and root mean square error of approximation = .08. Retell’s chi-square difference, Δχ2(1) = 16.652, p < .001, and factor loading (.250, p < .001) were higher for the comprehension construct. Similarly, retell’s correlation to comprehension measures (r = .155–.257, p < .01) was stronger than its relationship to measures of fluency (r = .158–.183, p < .01) or word identification (r = .132, p < .05). However, retell had a large residual variance (.938) and low interrater reliability (κ = .37), suggesting that improvements to the instrument are needed. Despite overall latent differences, retell did not demonstrate differential item functioning.
机译:在这项研究中,作者通过从第七和第八年级的不同样本的数据进行了比较了三因素模型的拟合,在确认因子分析框架内检测了确认因子分析框架内的能力。最终模型表现出足够的合适,χ 2 (32)= 97.316;比较拟合指数= .96; tucker-lewis指数= .94;近似均匀均误差= .08。 Retell的Chi-Square差异,ΔΣ 2 (1)= 16.652,p <.001,以及理解构建的因子加载(.250,p <.001)。类似地,Retell与理解措施的相关性(R = .155-.257,P <.01)比其与流利程度的关系强(R = .158-.183,P <.01)或单词识别(R = .132,p <.05)。但是,Retell具有大的剩余方差(.938)和低电阻工可靠性(κ= .37),表明需要改进仪器。尽管存在整体潜在的差异,但Retell没有展示差分项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号