首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Unexplained abdominal pain as a driver for inappropriate therapeutics: an audit on the use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors
【2h】

Unexplained abdominal pain as a driver for inappropriate therapeutics: an audit on the use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors

机译:无法解释的腹痛导致不当治疗的动因:对静脉使用质子泵抑制剂的审核

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently the most effective agents for acid-related disorders. However, studies show that 25–75% of patients receiving intravenous PPIs had no appropriate justification, indicating high rates of inappropriate prescribing.>Objective. To examine the appropriate use of intravenous PPIs in accordance with guidelines and the efficacy of a prescribing awareness intervention at an Asian teaching institution.>Setting. Prospective audit in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia.>Method. Every 4th intravenous PPI prescription received in the pharmacy was screened against hospital guidelines. Interventions for incorrect indication/dose/duration were performed. Patients’ demographic data, medical history and the use of intravenous PPI were collected. Included were all adult inpatients prescribed intravenous PPI.>Main Outcome Measure. Proportion of appropriate IV PPI prescriptions.>Results. Data for 106 patients were collected. Most patients were male [65(61.3%)], Chinese [50(47.2%)], with mean age ± SD = 60.3 ± 18.0 years. Most intravenous PPI prescriptions were initiated by junior doctors from the surgical [47(44.3%)] and medical [42(39.6%)] departments. Only 50/106(47.2%) patients had upper gastrointestinal endoscopy/surgery performed to verify the source of bleeding. Unexplained abdominal pain [81(76.4%)] was the main driver for prescribing intravenous PPIs empirically, out of which 73(68.9%) were for suspected upper gastrointestinal bleed. Overall, intravenous PPI was found to be inappropriately prescribed in 56(52.8%) patients for indication, dose or duration. Interventions on the use of intravenous PPI were most effective when performed by senior doctors (100%), followed by clinical pharmacists (50%), and inpatient pharmacists (37.5%, p = 0.027).>Conclusion. Inappropriate intravenous PPI usage is still prevalent despite the enforcement of hospital guidelines. The promotion of prescribing awareness and evidence-based prescribing through education of medical staff could result in more judicious use of intravenous PPI and dose-optimization.
机译:>背景。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是目前治疗酸相关疾病最有效的药物。但是,研究表明,接受静脉注射PPI的患者中有25–75%没有适当的理由,表明开处方的比率很高。>目的。根据指南和疗效检查静脉注射PPI的适当使用>设置。在马来西亚一家三级医院进行前瞻性审计。>方法。该药房每收到第4个静脉注射PPI处方,医院指南。进行了针对错误指示/剂量/持续时间的干预。收集患者的人口统计数据,病史和静脉注射PPI的使用情况。包括所有经静脉注射PPI的成年住院患者。>主要结果指标。适当的IV PPI处方比例。>结果。收集了106例患者的数据。大多数患者为男性[65(61.3%)],中国人[50(47.2%)],平均年龄为±SD = 60.3±18.0岁。大多数静脉注射PPI处方是由外科[47(44.3%)]和医疗[42(39.6%)]的初级医生发起的。只有50/106(47.2%)的患者进行了上消化道内窥镜检查/手术以证实出血的来源。无法解释的腹痛[81(76.4%)]是凭经验开出静脉注射PPI的主要驱动力,其中73(68.9%)是可疑的上消化道出血。总体而言,发现有56(52.8%)名患者因适应症,剂量或疗程不适当地静脉注射PPI。由高级医生(100%),其次是临床药剂师(50%)和住院药剂师(37.5%,p = 0.027)进行的使用静脉PPI的干预最有效。>结论。尽管执行了医院指南,但静脉注射PPI仍不适当。通过对医务人员进行教育来促进开处方的意识和循证开处方,可能会导致更明智地使用静脉注射PPI和优化剂量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号