首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits
【2h】

What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits

机译:保存和管理捐赠者离开后会发生什么?珊瑚礁生态学和利益相关者对管理利益的认识的前后研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The coral reefs of Tanga, Tanzania were recognized as a national conservation priority in the early 1970s, but the lack of a management response led to damage by dynamite, beach seines, and high numbers of fishers until the mid 1990s. Subsequently, an Irish Aid funded IUCN Eastern Africa program operated from 1994 to mid 2007 to implement increased management aimed at reducing these impacts. The main effects of this management were to establish collaborative management areas, reduce dynamite and seine net fishing, and establish small community fisheries closures beginning in 1996. The ecology of the coral reefs was studied just prior to the initiation of this management in 1996, during, 2004, and a few years after the project ended in 2010. The perceptions of resource users towards management options were evaluated in 2010. The ecological studies indicated that the biomass of fish rose continuously during this period from 260 to 770 kg/ha but the small closures were no different from the non-closure areas. The benthic community studies indicate stability in the coral cover and community composition and an increase in coralline algae and topographic complexity over time. The lack of change in the coral community suggests resilience to various disturbances including fisheries management and the warm temperature anomaly of 1998. These results indicate that some aspects of the management program had been ecologically successful even after the donor program ended. Moreover, the increased compliance with seine net use and dynamite restrictions were the most likely factors causing this increase in fish biomass and not the closures. Resource users interviewed in 2010 were supportive of gear restrictions but there was considerable between-community disagreement over the value of specific restrictions. The social-ecological results suggest that increased compliance with gear restrictions is largely responsible for the improvements in reef ecology and is a high priority for future management programs.
机译:1970年代初,坦桑尼亚坦a的珊瑚礁被公认为国家保护重点,但是直到1990年代中期,由于缺乏管理措施,炸药,海滩围网和大量渔民造成破坏。随后,由爱尔兰援助资助的自然保护联盟东非计划于1994年至2007年中开始实施,以实施旨在减少这些影响的加强管理。这种管理的主要作用是建立合作管理区域,减少炸药和围网捕鱼,并从1996年开始建立小型社区渔业关闭。1996年开始实施该管理之前,对珊瑚礁的生态进行了研究。 ,2004年以及该项目于2010年结束后的几年。2010年评估了资源使用者对管理选择的看法。生态研究表明,在此期间,鱼类的生物量从260公斤/公顷持续增加到770公斤/公顷。小封闭区与非封闭区没有区别。底栖群落研究表明,随着时间的推移,珊瑚的覆盖度和群落组成稳定,珊瑚藻和地形复杂性增加。珊瑚群落的变化不足表明对各种干扰的抵御力,包括渔业管理和1998年温暖的温度异常。这些结果表明,即使捐助者计划结束,该管理计划的某些方面在生态上也是成功的。此外,对围网使用和炸药限制的依从性增加是造成鱼类生物量增加而不是关闭的最可能因素。 2010年接受采访的资源用户支持设备限制,但社区之间在特定限制的价值方面存在很大分歧。社会生态学结果表明,对渔具限制的更多遵守是造成礁石生态学改善的主要原因,也是未来管理计划的重中之重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号