首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Between- and Within-Occupation Inequality: The Case of High-Status Professions
【2h】

Between- and Within-Occupation Inequality: The Case of High-Status Professions

机译:职业之间和职业内部的不平等:高级职业案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this chapter, we present analyses of the roles of education and occupation in shaping trends in income inequality among college-educated workers in the U.S., drawing data from two sources: (1) the 1960–2000 U.S. Censuses and (2) the 2006–2008 three-year American Community Survey. We also examine in detail historical trends in between-occupation and within-occupation income inequality for a small set of high-status professionals, with focused attention on the economic wellbeing of scientists. Our research yields four findings. First, education premiums have increased. Second, both between-occupation and within-occupation inequality increased at about the same rates for college graduates, so that the portion of inequality attributable to occupational differences remained constant. Third, scientists have lost ground relative to other similarly educated professionals. Fourth, trends in within-occupation inequality vary by occupation and education, making any sweeping summary on the roles of education and occupation in the overall increase in income inequality difficult.
机译:在本章中,我们从两个来源的数据中分析了教育和职业在塑造美国受大学教育的工人收入不平等趋势中的作用,这些数据来自两个来源:(1)1960-2000年美国人口普查;(2)2006年。 –2008年的三年期美国社区调查。我们还详细研究了少数高地位专业人员的职业间和职业内收入不平等的历史趋势,重点关注科学家的经济状况。我们的研究得出四个发现。首先,教育保险费增加了。第二,大学毕业生的职业间和职业内不平等都以大约相同的速度增加,因此,由职业差异引起的不平等部分保持不变。第三,相对于其他受过类似教育的专业人员,科学家已经失去了基础。第四,在职内部不平等的趋势因职业和教育而异,因此很难对教育和职业在收入不平等总体增加中的作用进行全面概括。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号