首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Incrementality in Planning of Speech During Speaking and Reading Aloud: Evidence from Eye-Tracking
【2h】

Incrementality in Planning of Speech During Speaking and Reading Aloud: Evidence from Eye-Tracking

机译:朗读和朗读期间言语计划的增量性:来自眼动的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Speaking is an incremental process where planning and articulation interleave. While incrementality has been studied in reading and online speech production separately, it has not been directly compared within one investigation. This study set out to compare the extent of planning incrementality in online sentence formulation versus reading aloud and how discourse context may constrain the planning scope of utterance preparation differently in these two modes of speech planning. Two eye-tracking experiments are reported: participants either described pictures of transitive events (Experiment 1) or read aloud the written descriptions of those events (Experiment 2). In both experiments, the information status of an object character was manipulated in the discourse preceding each picture or sentence. In the Literal condition, participants heard a story where object character was literally mentioned (e.g., fly). In the No Mention condition, stories did not literally mention nor prime the object character depicted on the picture or written in the sentence. The target response was expected to have the same structure and content in all conditions (The frog catches the fly). During naming, the results showed shorter speech onset latencies in the Literal condition than in the No Mention condition. However, no significant differences in gaze durations were found. In contrast, during reading, there were no significant differences in speech onset latencies but there were significantly longer gaze durations to the target picture/word in the Literal than in the No Mention condition. Our results shot that planning is more incremental during reading than during naming and that discourse context can be helpful during speaker but may hinder during reading aloud. Taken together our results suggest that on-line planning of response is affected by both linguistic and non-linguistic factors.
机译:口语是一个逐步进行的过程,在此过程中计划和发音相互交错。虽然增量性已分别在阅读和在线语音制作中进行了研究,但尚未在一项调查中直接进行比较。这项研究旨在比较在线句子表达和朗读中计划增量的程度,以及语境如何在这两种语言计划模式中不同地限制话语准备的计划范围。报告了两个眼动追踪实验:参与者要么描述传递事件的图片(实验1),要么大声朗读这些事件的书面描述(实验2)。在两个实验中,在每个图片或句子之前的论述中都操纵了对象角色的信息状态。在文字状态下,参与者听到了一个故事,其中字面上提到了人物角色(例如,飞行)。在“不提”条件下,故事没有字面提及或涂上图片中所描绘或句子中所写的宾语。预期目标反应在所有条件下都具有相同的结构和内容(青蛙会飞)。在命名过程中,结果表明,与“没有提及”条件相比,“直语”条件下的语音发作等待时间短。但是,没有发现凝视持续时间的显着差异。相比之下,在阅读过程中,言语起始潜伏期没有显着差异,但与“未提及”条件相比,直译中目标图片/单词的凝视时间明显更长。我们的结果表明,阅读过程中的计划要比命名过程中的增量更多,并且话语上下文在说话者中可能会有所帮助,但在大声朗读时可能会有所阻碍。总之,我们的结果表明,在线反应计划受语言和非语言因素的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号