首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Simplified Models of Non-Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Based on CT Images
【2h】

Simplified Models of Non-Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Based on CT Images

机译:基于CT图像的无创分数流储备的简化模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard to assess the functional coronary stenosis. The non-invasive assessment of diameter stenosis (DS) using coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has high false positive rate in contrast to FFR. Combining CTA with computational fluid dynamics (CFD), recent studies have shown promising predictions of FFRCT for superior assessment of lesion severity over CTA alone. The CFD models tend to be computationally expensive, however, and require several hours for completing analysis. Here, we introduce simplified models to predict noninvasive FFR at substantially less computational time. In this retrospective pilot study, 21 patients received coronary CTA. Subsequently a total of 32 vessels underwent invasive FFR measurement. For each vessel, FFR based on steady-state and analytical models (FFRSS and FFRAM, respectively) were calculated non-invasively based on CTA and compared with FFR. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 90.6% (87.5%), 80.0% (80.0%), 95.5% (90.9%), 88.9% (80.0%) and 91.3% (90.9%) respectively for FFRSS (and FFRAM) on a per-vessel basis, and were 75.0%, 50.0%, 86.4%, 62.5% and 79.2% respectively for DS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.963, 0.954 and 0.741 for FFRSS, FFRAM and DS respectively, on a per-patient level. The results suggest that the CTA-derived FFRSS performed well in contrast to invasive FFR and they had better diagnostic performance than DS from CTA in the identification of functionally significant lesions. In contrast to FFRCT, FFRSS requires much less computational time.
机译:有创分数血流储备(FFR)是评估功能性冠状动脉狭窄的金标准。与FFR相比,使用冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影(CTA)进行的直径狭窄(DS)的非侵入性评估具有较高的假阳性率。将CTA与计算流体动力学(CFD)结合起来,最近的研究表明,FFRCT对病变严重程度的评估比单独使用CTA的前景更好。但是,CFD模型在计算上往往很昂贵,并且需要几个小时才能完成分析。在这里,我们介绍了简化的模型来以更少的计算时间预测无创FFR。在这项回顾性先导研究中,有21例患者接受了冠状动脉CTA。随后,共有32艘血管接受了有创FFR测量。对于每艘船,基于CTA的无创计算基于稳态模型和分析模型(分别为FFRSS和FFRAM)的FFR,并将其与FFR进行比较。准确性,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为90.6%(87.5%),80.0%(80.0%),95.5%(90.9%),88.9%(80.0%)和91.3%(90.9%) FFRSS(和FFRAM)的按船计算,DS分别为75.0%,50.0%,86.4%,62.5%和79.2%。在每个患者水平上,FFRSS,FFRAM和DS的接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积分别为0.963、0.954和0.741。结果表明,与侵入性FFR相比,源自CTA的FFRSS表现良好,并且在识别功能上重要的病变方面,其诊断性能优于CTA的DS。与FFRCT相比,FFRSS需要更少的计算时间。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号