首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Population effect of influenza vaccination under co-circulation of non-vaccine variants and the case for a bivalent A/H3N2 vaccine component
【2h】

Population effect of influenza vaccination under co-circulation of non-vaccine variants and the case for a bivalent A/H3N2 vaccine component

机译:非疫苗变体共同流通下的流感疫苗接种的种群效应和二价A / H3N2疫苗成分的情况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Some past epidemics of different influenza subtypes (particularly A/H3N2) in the US saw co-circulation of vaccine-type and variant strains. There is evidence that natural infection with one influenza subtype offers short-term protection against infection with another influenza subtype (henceforth, cross-immunity). This suggests that such cross-immunity for strains within a subtype is expected to be strong. Therefore, while vaccination effective against one strain may reduce transmission of that strain, this may also lead to a reduction of the vaccine-type strain’s ability to suppress spread of a variant strain. It remains unclear what the joint effect of vaccination and cross-immunity is for co-circulating influenza strains within a subtype, and what is the potential benefit of a bivalent vaccine that protects against both strains.We simulated co-circulation of vaccine-type and variant strains under a variety of scenarios. In each scenario, we considered the case when the vaccine efficacy against the variant strain is lower than the efficacy against the vaccine-type strain (monovalent vaccine), as well the case when vaccine is equally efficacious against both strains (bivalent vaccine).Administration of a bivalent vaccine results in a significant reduction in the overall incidence of infection compared to administration of a monovalent vaccine, even with lower coverage by the bivalent vaccine. Additionally, we found that with greater cross-immunity, increasing coverage levels for the monovalent vaccine becomes less beneficial, while introducing the bivalent vaccine becomes more beneficial.Our work exhibits the limitations of influenza vaccines that have low efficacy against non-vaccine strains, and demonstrates the benefits of vaccines that offer good protection against multiple influenza strains. The results elucidate the need for guarding against the potential co-circulation of non-vaccine strains for an influenza subtype, at least during select seasons, possibly through inclusion of multiple strains within a subtype (particularly A/H3N2) in a vaccine.
机译:在美国,过去一些流行的不同流感亚型(尤其是A / H3N2)的流行病看到了疫苗型和变异株的共同传播。有证据表明,一种流感亚型的自然感染可为防止另一种流感亚型的感染提供短期保护(以下简称“交叉免疫”)。这表明对亚型内菌株的这种交叉免疫被认为是强的。因此,虽然针对一种菌株有效的疫苗接种可以减少该菌株的传播,但这也可能导致疫苗型菌株抑制变异菌株传播的能力降低。尚不清楚疫苗接种和交叉免疫的联合作用对于在亚型中共同传播流感病毒株有什么作用,同时保护两种病毒的二价疫苗的潜在益处是什么。各种情况下的变异株。在每种情况下,我们都考虑了针对变种菌株的疫苗功效低于针对疫苗型菌株(单价疫苗)的功效的情况,以及针对两种菌株(二价疫苗)同样有效的疫苗的情形。与单价疫苗的施用相比,即使二价疫苗的覆盖率较低,二价疫苗的接种也会导致总体感染发生率显着降低。此外,我们发现随着交叉免疫力的提高,单价疫苗的覆盖率水平提高的益处逐渐减弱,而引入二价疫苗的覆盖率则变得更加有益。我们的研究表明,针对非疫苗株的流感疫苗效率低下,存在局​​限性;证明了针对多种流感病毒株提供良好保护的疫苗的好处。结果阐明了至少在选定的季节中可能需要通过在疫苗的亚型(特别是A / H3N2)中包含多种毒株来预防非流感毒株对流感亚型的潜在共流通的需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号