首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Do Schools Reinforce or Reduce Learning Gaps between Advantaged andDisadvantaged Students? Evidence from Vietnam and Peru
【2h】

Do Schools Reinforce or Reduce Learning Gaps between Advantaged andDisadvantaged Students? Evidence from Vietnam and Peru

机译:学校是否加强或减少了优势学生和弱势学生之间的学习差距弱势学生?越南和秘鲁的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examines – for two developing countries, Vietnam and Peru – whether disadvantaged children learn less than advantaged children when both types of children are enrolled in the same school. This is done by estimating education production functions that contain two school fixed effects for each school, one for advantaged children and one for disadvantaged children. The paper examines six different definitions of advantage, based on household wealth, cognitive skills at age 5, gender, ethnicity (Peru only), maternal education, and nutritional status. The results show no sign that schools are less effective for disadvantaged groups in Vietnam; indeed if anything one traditionally advantaged group, males, seems to do worse in school than the corresponding disadvantaged group, females. In contrast, in Peru ethnic minority students and students who enter primary school with low cognitive skills appear to learn less in school than ethnic majority students and students with relatively high cognitive skills, respectively, who are enrolled in the same school.
机译:本文针对两个发展中国家(越南和秘鲁)研究了当两种类型的儿童都在同一所学校就读时,弱势儿童的学习情况是否比弱势儿童的学习情况少。这是通过估算教育生产函数来完成的,其中每个学校包含两个学校固定效应,一个用于弱势儿童,一个用于弱势儿童。本文根据家庭财富,5岁时的认知技能,性别,种族(仅限秘鲁),孕产妇教育和营养状况,研究了六种不同的优势定义。结果表明,没有迹象表明学校对越南的弱势群体没有那么有效;实际上,如果有一个传统上处于优势地位的群体,即男性,在学业上似乎比相应的处于不利地位的群体,即女性,表现得更差。相反,在秘鲁,少数民族学生和认知技能较低的小学学生的学业似乎分别比同一所学校的少数民族学生和认知技能相对较高的学生低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号