首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >IS OUR CITY ‘AGE-FRIENDLY’? BEING AGED AND POOR IN A SUPRA-CAPITALIST SOCIETY
【2h】

IS OUR CITY ‘AGE-FRIENDLY’? BEING AGED AND POOR IN A SUPRA-CAPITALIST SOCIETY

机译:我们的城市是老友记吗?超级资本主义社会中的老年人和贫困者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

‘Age Friendly City’ initiated by World Health Organization (WHO) is now a buzzword in Hong Kong. The Policy Address by the Chief Executive 2016 promotes such concept. However, when the organic unity of the ‘city’ is ‘undone, dismembered and dislocated’ by capitalism(Lefebvre), it is difficult to make the urban environment ‘friendly’. In Hong Kong, a supra-capitalist society where the Gini-coefficient for households surges to 0.537 (2011), and 1/3 of residents aged over 65 lives below the poverty line, it is almost impossible to rely on the ‘Age Friendly City guidelines, requiring only minor adjustments on government policy, to enable poorer elders to live a life with quality.Using methods of ethnographic observation and in depth interview, our research has explored how older homeless people, ageing scavengers and illegal hawkers used the public space as a place for daily living, for earning their daily bread, for social participation and networking --- that means for life. Applying the theories of social gerontology, critical geography and urban poverty, our paper will discuss critically the spatiality of these poorer elders, their adaptation to the drastic living environment and tactics of resistance. Our qualitative methodological approach would not only offer an intense dialogue between the theories for interpretation and the empirical cases, it will also reveal the capitalist ideology embedded in the WHO Age Friendly City guidelines which excludes the older people of the grassroots class to lead their life in the public space.
机译:世界卫生组织(WHO)发起的“友好城市时代”现在在香港成为流行语。行政长官在《 2016年施政报告》中推广了这一概念。但是,当“城市”的有机统一性被资本主义(勒费弗尔)“摧毁,肢解和流离失所”时,很难使城市环境变得“友好”。在香港这个超资本主义社会,家庭的基尼系数飙升至0.537(2011),而65岁以上的居民中有1/3的人生活在贫困线以下,因此几乎不可能依靠“年龄友好城市”指南,仅需对政府政策进行少量调整,即可使较贫穷的老年人过上优质的生活。通过人种学观察和深度访谈的方法,我们的研究探索了老年人无家可归者,老龄拾荒者和非法小贩如何利用公共空间一个生活,赚取日常面包,参与社会和建立社交网络的地方-这意味着生命。应用社会老年学,临界地理学和城市贫困的理论,我们的论文将批判性地讨论这些较贫穷的老年人的空间,他们对恶劣生活环境的适应和抵抗策略。我们的定性方法论方法不仅会在解释理论和实证案例之间展开激烈的对话,还将揭示世卫组织《老年友好城市指南》中所包含的资本主义意识形态,其中排除了基层阶级的老年人在生活中的生活。公共空间。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 other
  • 作者

    Y. Kwok;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(1),Suppl 1
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 1371
  • 总页数 1
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号