首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Do Lessons in Nature Boost Subsequent Classroom Engagement? Refueling Students in Flight
【2h】

Do Lessons in Nature Boost Subsequent Classroom Engagement? Refueling Students in Flight

机译:大自然的教训会促进随后的课堂互动吗?在飞行中为学生加油

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Teachers wishing to offer lessons in nature may hold back for fear of leaving students keyed up and unable to concentrate in subsequent, indoor lessons. This study tested the hypothesis that lessons in nature have positive—not negative—aftereffects on subsequent classroom engagement. Using carefully matched pairs of lessons (one in a relatively natural outdoor setting and one indoors), we observed subsequent classroom engagement during an indoor instructional period, replicating these comparisons over 10 different topics and weeks in the school year, in each of two third grade classrooms. Pairs were roughly balanced in how often the outdoor lesson preceded or followed the classroom lesson. Classroom engagement was significantly better after lessons in nature than after their matched counterparts for four of the five measures developed for this study: teacher ratings; third-party tallies of “redirects” (the number of times the teacher stopped instruction to direct student attention back onto the task at hand); independent, photo-based ratings made blind to condition; and a composite index each showed a nature advantage; student ratings did not. This nature advantage held across different teachers and held equally over the initial and final 5 weeks of lessons. And the magnitude of the advantage was large. In 48 out of 100 paired comparisons, the nature lesson was a full standard deviation better than its classroom counterpart; in 20 of the 48, the nature lesson was over two standard deviations better. The rate of “redirects” was cut almost in half after a lesson in nature, allowing teachers to teach for longer periods uninterrupted. Because the pairs of lessons were matched on teacher, class (students and classroom), topic, teaching style, week of the semester, and time of day, the advantage of the nature-based lessons could not be attributed to any of these factors. It appears that, far from leaving students too keyed up to concentrate afterward, lessons in nature may actually leave students more able to engage in the next lesson, even as students are also learning the material at hand. Such “refueling in flight” argues for including more lessons in nature in formal education.
机译:希望在大自然中开设课程的老师可能会因为担心让学生陷入困境而无法集中精力从事随后的室内课程而退缩。这项研究检验了以下假设:自然课堂对以后的课堂参与具有积极而非消极的影响。通过精心配对的课程(在相对自然的户外环境中进行一堂课,在室内进行一堂课),我们观察了室内教学期间随后的课堂参与情况,并将这些比较结果复制到了学年的10个不同主题和几周的三个三年级的每个年级中教室。两人在户外课程开始或之后在课堂上的频率大致保持平衡。就本研究制定的五项指标中的四项而言,自然课后的课堂参与度明显好于同类课堂。第三方对“重定向”的计数(教师停止指导以将学生的注意力重新引导到手头任务上的次数);独立的,基于照片的评级使人无视条件;综合指数均显示出自然优势;学生评分没有。这种自然优势在不同的老师之间都有,并且在课程的最初和最后五个星期都保持不变。而且优势很大。在100个配对比较中,有48个自然课程的标准偏差要比课堂上的标准偏差要好。在48个中的20个中,自然课比两个标准差更好。经过一堂自然的课后,“重定向”率几乎降低了一半,使教师可以不间断地进行较长时间的教学。由于这对课程是根据教师,班级(学生和教室),主​​题,教学风格,学期的周数和一天中的时间进行匹配的,因此基于自然的课程的优势不能归因于这些因素中的任何一个。看起来,自然的课并不会使学生过于费力地专注于事后学习,实际上可以使学生更有能力参加下一堂课,即使学生也在学习手头的材料。这种“加油飞行”主张在正规教育中包括更多自然课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号