Creative Processes in the Shaping of a Musical Interpretation: A Study of Nine Professional Musicians

摘要

Various studies have been conducted to understand the role of mental representation when musicians practice or perform music (Lehman and Ericsson, ; Sloboda, ) and the work steps required for a musician to prepare a concert (Chaffin et al., ). More recent studies examine creativity in the shaping of a musical interpretation (Lisboa et al., ; Payne, ; Barros et al., ; Wise et al., ). However, none of these studies answers the following questions: Why do expert musicians working from the same score create different musical interpretations? During individual practice sessions, what happens that allows each musician to produce significantly different interpretive results? To answer these questions, we instructed nine expert musicians to record their individual practice sessions, verbalize their actions and thoughts, and answer a self-reflection questionnaire. A third-party observer also described what happened during the practice sessions. We conducted interviews in order to gather additional information about the contents of the individual practice sessions; the musicians' usual work habits; and their beliefs, values, and ideas regarding the role of the musician in the creative process. Based on the methodology of Analyse par théorisation ancrée (Paillé, ), we were able to take into account a diverse data set and identify aspects of the creative process that were specific to each individual as well as elements that all musicians shared. We found that the context in which the creative process takes place—the musician (e.g., his or her values and knowledge); the musical work (e.g., style, technical aspects, etc.); and the external constraints (e.g., deadlines, public expectations, etc.)—impacted the strategies used. The participants used reflection, extramusical supports, emotions, body reactions, intuition, and other tools to generate new musical ideas and evaluate the accuracy of their musical interpretations. We identified elements related to those already discussed in the literature, including the creative process as an alternation between divergent and convergent thinking (Guilford, ), creative associations (Lubart, ), and artistic appropriation (Héroux and Fortier, ; Héroux, ).