首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gastroenterology Report >Value of transrectal ultrasonography for tumor node metastasis restaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
【2h】

Value of transrectal ultrasonography for tumor node metastasis restaging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

机译:经直肠超声检查对新辅助放化疗后局部晚期直肠癌患者肿瘤转移的价值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To explore the value of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) for tumor node metastasis (TNM) restaging for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT).>Methods: One hundred and forty-nine patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 or cN+) who underwent TRUS after neo-CRT were retrospectively reviewed. TRUS restaging was compared with the results of post-operative pathological TNM findings.>Results: After neo-CRT, the accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing T-staging was 30.9%, with 60.4% (90/149) of cases overestimated. The sensitivity of TRUS for T-staging (T0 vs T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4) were 16.3%, 0%, 12.5%, 42.6% and 75.0%, respectively. The accuracy of TRUS for diagnosing N-staging after neo-CRT was 81.2%, with the sensitivities of N0 and N+ were 93.3% and 31.0%, respectively. After neo-CRT, 27.5% (41/149) of patients achieved pathologically complete response (pCR). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of TRUS for pCR were 17.1%, 99.1%, 87.5% and 75.9%, respectively.>Conclusions: TRUS can be applied for restaging T4 and N0, and has potential for screening out patients with pCR in those with locally advanced rectal cancer after neo-CRT, although some stages are overestimated for T-staging and its sensitivity for predicting pCR is low.
机译:>目的:探讨经直肠超声(TRUS)对新辅助放化疗(neo-CRT)后局部晚期直肠癌患者的肿瘤转移(TNM)分期的价值。>方法:回顾性分析了在新CRT后接受TRUS的149例局部晚期直肠癌(cT3-4或cN +)患者。将TRUS分期与术后病理TNM发现的结果进行比较。>结果:在进行新CRT后,TRUS诊断T分期的准确性为30.9%,其中60.4%(90/149)被高估的案件。 TRUS对T分期(T0 vs T1 vs T2 vs T3 vs T4)的敏感性分别为16.3%,0%,12.5%,42.6%和75.0%。新CRT后TRUS诊断N期的准确性为81.2%,N0和N +的敏感性分别为93.3%和31.0%。 Neo-CRT后,有27.5%(41/149)的患者达到了病理完全缓解(pCR)。 TRUS对pCR的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为17.1%,99.1%,87.5%和75.9%。>结论: TRUS可用于再分期T4和N0,尽管某些阶段的T分期被高估了,并且预测pCR的敏感性较低,但在新CRT后局部晚期直肠癌患者中有可能筛查pCR患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号