首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Poultry Science >The effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages Part II: Behavior at the feeder
【2h】

The effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages Part II: Behavior at the feeder

机译:剩余空间和笼子尺寸对带家具笼子中产蛋母鸡的影响第二部分:喂食器的行为

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Standards for feeder (a.k.a. feed trough) space allowance (SA) are based primarily on studies in conventional cages where laying hens tend to eat simultaneously, limiting feeder space. Large furnished cages (FC) offer more total space and opportunities to perform a greater variety of behaviors, which may affect feeding behavior and feeder space requirements. Our objective was to determine the effects of floor/feeder SA on behavior at the feeder. LSL-Lite hens were housed in FC equipped with a nest, perches, and a scratch mat. Hens with SA of either 520 cm2 (Low; 8.9 cm feeder space/hen) or 748 cm2 (High; 12.8 cm feeder space/hen) per bird resulted in groups of 40 vs. 28 birds in small FC (SFC) and 80 vs. 55 in large FC (LFC). Chain feeders ran at 0500, 0800, 1100, 1400, and 1700 with lights on at 0500 and off at 1900 hours. Digital recordings of FC were scanned at chain feeder onset and every 15 min for one h after (5 scans × 5 feeding times × 2 d) to count the number of birds with their head in the feeder. All occurrences of aggressive pecks and displacements during 2 continuous 30-minute observations at 0800 h and 1700 h also were counted. Mixed model repeated analyses tested the effects of SA, cage size, and time on the percent of hens feeding, and the frequency of aggressive pecks and displacements. Surprisingly, the percent of birds feeding simultaneously was similar regardless of cage size (LFC: 23.0 ± 0.9%; SFC: 24.0 ± 1.0%; P = 0.44) or SA (Low: 23.8 ± 0.9%; High: 23.3 ± 1.0%; P = 0.62). More birds were observed feeding at 1700 h (35.3 ± 0.1%) than any at other time (P < 0.001). Feeder use differed by cage area (nest, middle, or scratch) over the d (P < 0.001). The frequency of aggressive pecks was low overall and not affected by SA or cage size. Frequency of displacements was also low but greater at Low SA (P = 0.001). There was little evidence of feeder competition at the Low SA in this study.
机译:喂食器(又称喂食器)空间津贴(SA)标准主要基于对常规笼子的研究,在这种笼子中,产蛋鸡往往会同时进食,从而限制了喂食器的空间。大型带家具的笼子(FC)提供了更多的总空间,并提供了执行更多行为的机会,这可能会影响进食行为和进料器空间要求。我们的目标是确定地板/进纸器SA对进纸器行为的影响。 LSL-Lite母鸡被安置在FC中,并配有巢,高位和防刮垫。母鸡的SA值为520 cm 2 (低; 8.9厘米喂食器空间/母鸡)或748 cm 2 (高; 12.8厘米喂食器空间/母鸡)小FC(SFC)中有40羽vs.28羽成鸽组,而大型FC(LFC)中有80羽55羽成群。链式进料器分别在0500、0800、1100、1400和1700运行,灯在0500点亮,在1900小时熄灭。 FC的数字记录在链式喂食器开始时进行扫描,之后每15分钟扫描一次(5次扫描×5次喂食时间×2 d),以计算其喂食器中有鸟的鸟的数量。在0800h和1700h连续2次30分钟的观察中,也计算了所有侵略性啄和位移的发生。混合模型的重复分析测试了SA,笼子大小和时间对母鸡进食百分比的影响,以及主动啄食和移位的频率。令人惊讶的是,无论笼大小(LFC:23.0±0.9%; SFC:24.0±1.0%; P = 0.44)或SA(低:23.8±0.9%;高:23.3±1.0%; P = 0.62)。在1700小时(35.3±0.1%)的喂食次数比其他时间多(P <0.001)。喂食器的使用因d上的笼子区域(巢,中间或刮擦)而异(P <0.001)。攻击性啄木鸟的总体频率较低,不受SA或笼子大小的影响。位移频率也很低,但在低SA时位移频率更大(P = 0.001)。在这项研究中,几乎没有证据表明低SA的饲养者竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号