首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >The effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part II: Behavior at the feeder
【24h】

The effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part II: Behavior at the feeder

机译:空间津贴和笼尺寸对饲养笼中铺设母鸡的影响,第二部分:饲养者的行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Standards for feeder (a. k. a. feed trough) space allowance (SA) are based primarily on studies in conventional cages where laying hens tend to eat simultaneously, limiting feeder space. Large furnished cages (FC) offer more total space and opportunities to perform a greater variety of behaviors, which may affect feeding behavior and feeder space requirements. Our objective was to determine the effects of floor/feeder SA on behavior at the feeder. LSL-Lite hens were housed in FC equipped with a nest, perches, and a scratch mat. Hens with SA of either 520 cm(2) (Low; 8.9 cm feeder space/hen) or 748 cm(2) (High; 12.8 cm feeder space/hen) per bird resulted in groups of 40 vs. 28 birds in small FC (SFC) and 80 vs. 55 in large FC (LFC). Chain feeders ran at 0500, 0800, 1100, 1400, and 1700 with lights on at 0500 and off at 1900 hours. Digital recordings of FC were scanned at chain feeder onset and every 15 min for one h after (5 scans x 5 feeding times x 2 d) to count the number of birds with their head in the feeder. All occurrences of aggressive pecks and displacements during 2 continuous 30-minute observations at 0800 h and 1700 h also were counted. Mixed model repeated analyses tested the effects of SA, cage size, and time on the percent of hens feeding, and the frequency of aggressive pecks and displacements. Surprisingly, the percent of birds feeding simultaneously was similar regardless of cage size (LFC: 23.0 +/- 0.9%; SFC: 24.0 +/- 1.0%; P = 0.44) or SA (Low: 23.8 +/- 0.9%; High: 23.3 +/- 1.0%; P = 0.62). More birds were observed feeding at 1700 h (35.3 +/- 0.1%) than any at other time (P 0.001). Feeder use differed by cage area (nest, middle, or scratch) over the d (P 0.001). The frequency of aggressive pecks was low overall and not affected by SA or cage size. Frequency of displacements was also low but greater at Low SA (P = 0.001). There was little evidence of feeder competition at the Low SA in this study.
机译:馈线标准(a。k。饲料槽)空间津贴(SA)主要基于常规笼子的研究,其中铺设母鸡倾向于同时吃,限制馈线空间。大型家具笼(FC)提供更多的总空间和机会,以执行更多各种行为,这可能会影响饲养行为和馈线空间要求。我们的目标是确定地板/饲养者SA对饲养者行为的影响。 LSL-Lite母鸡被安置在配备巢,栖息的FC和划痕垫上。母鸡有520厘米(2)(低; 8.9厘米进纸空间/母鸡)或748厘米(2)(高; 12.8cm馈线空间/母鸡)导致小型FC中的40个与28只鸟类(SFC)和大型FC(LFC)中的80 vs.55。连锁送料器在0500,0800,1100,1400和1700时运行,在0500和1900小时内享受灯光。在链料器发作时扫描Fc的数字录像,每15分钟扫描一次(5扫描x 5喂食时间x 2 d),以将纸条的鸟类数量计数在馈线中。在0800 H和1700小时的情况下,在2连续30分钟观察期间侵略性啄物和位移的所有发生也被计算。混合模型重复分析测试了SA,笼尺寸和时间对母鸡饲料百分比的影响,以及侵略性的啄波物和位移的频率。令人惊讶的是,无论笼尺寸如何(LFC:23.0 +/- 0.9%; SFC:24.0 +/- 1.0%; P = 0.44)或SA(低:23.8 +/- 0.9%,百分比相似:23.3 +/- 1.0%; p = 0.62)。观察到更多的鸟类在1700小时(35.3 +/- 0.1%)喂食而不是其他时间(P <0.001)。馈线使用在D上的笼区域(巢,中间或划痕)不同(P <0.001)。侵略性啄物的频率整体较低,不受SA或笼尺寸的影响。低SA的位移频率也低,但更大(p = 0.001)。在这项研究中,在Low SA时几乎没有饲养者竞争的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号