首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation >Considering health insurance: how do dialysis initiates with Medicaid coverage differ from persons without Medicaid coverage?
【2h】

Considering health insurance: how do dialysis initiates with Medicaid coverage differ from persons without Medicaid coverage?

机译:考虑健康保险:在没有医疗补助的情况下发起透析的人与没有医疗补助的人有何区别?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Type of health insurance is an important mediator of medical outcomes in the United States. Medicaid, a jointly sponsored Federal/State programme, is designed to serve medically needy individuals. How these patients differ from non-Medicaid-enrolled incident dialysis patients and how these differences have changed over time have not been systematically examined.>Methods. Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we identified individuals initiating dialysis from 1995 to 2004 and categorized their health insurance status. Longitudinal trends in demographic, risk behaviour, functional, comorbidity, laboratory and dialysis modality factors, as reported on the Medical Evidence Form (CMS-2728), were examined in all insurance groups. Polychotomous logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted generalized ratios (AGRs) for these factors by insurance status, with Medicaid as the referent insurance group.>Results. Overall, males constitute a growing percentage of both Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients, but in contrast to other insurance groups, Medicaid has a higher proportion of females. Non-Caucasians also constitute a higher proportion of Medicaid patients than non-Medicaid patients. Body mass index increased in all groups over time, and all groups witnessed a significant decrease in initiation on peritoneal dialysis. Polychotomous regression showed generally lower AGRs for minorities, risk behaviours and functional status, and higher AGRs for males, employment and self-care dialysis, for non-Medicaid insurance relative to Medicaid.>Conclusions. While many broad parallel trends are evident in both Medicaid and non-Medicaid incident dialysis patients, many important differences between these groups exist. These findings could have important implications for policy planners, providers and payers.
机译:>背景。健康保险的类型是美国医疗结局的重要中介。 Medicaid是联邦/州联合发起的计划,旨在为有医疗需求的个人提供服务。这些患者与未参加医疗事故的透析患者之间的差异,以及这些差异随时间的变化尚未得到系统的研究。>方法。我们使用来自美国肾脏数据系统的数据,确定了引发这些疾病的个体从1995年至2004年进行透析,并对其健康保险状况进行了分类。在所有保险组中,均检查了医学证据表(CMS-2728)上的人口统计学,风险行为,功能,合并症,实验室和透析方式因素的纵向趋势。 >结果。总体而言,男性在医疗补助和非医疗补助中所占的百分比均在增长,而多分类对数回归用于通过保险状态估算这些因素的调整后的广义比率(AGR),以Medicaid为参照保险组。医疗补助患者,但与其他保险类别相比,医疗补助女性比例更高。非高加索人在医疗补助患者中所占的比例也高于非医疗补助患者。随着时间的推移,所有组的体重指数均增加,并且所有组的腹膜透析起始剂量均显着下降。多面回归分析显示,相对于Medicaid,非医疗保险的少数民族,风险行为和功能状态的AGR通常较低,而男性,就业和自我护理透析的男性AGR较高。>结论。在医疗补助和非医疗补助事件透析患者中​​,这种趋势都很明显,这两个群体之间存在许多重要差异。这些发现可能对政策规划者,提供者和付款人具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号