首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine >Effect of a Brief Seated Massage on Nursing Student Attitudes Toward Touch for Comfort Care
【2h】

Effect of a Brief Seated Massage on Nursing Student Attitudes Toward Touch for Comfort Care

机译:短暂坐姿按摩对护理学生抚触舒适感的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: While massage has been removed from nursing curricula, studies have reported massage as safe and effective for stress reduction, relaxation, pain relief, fatigue, and quality of life.>Objective: To compare the efficacy of two intensities of touch administered during two seated massages on the attitudes of nursing students toward touch for their self-care and patient care.>Participants: Nursing students who volunteered gave institutional review board–approved written informed consent to undergo massage by a licensed massage therapist.>Settings/location: A private room adjacent to the nursing lab in a school of nursing.>Intervention: Brief seated massages of differing intensities. Each participant received low-intensity and high-intensity touch in a two-block, randomized order, within-subjects design. Linear mixed models nested within subject and random intercept analyses were used to test hypotheses in this two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover design.>Outcome measures: Health questionnaires/visual analogue scales pertaining to physical/affective/and attitudinal status were completed before and after each massage.>Results: Twenty-nine participants (93% female, 83% single) completed the study. Before massage, the optimal intensity of touch anticipated for self-comfort was 6.6 (0=no pressure;10=most intense pressure imaginable). The mean touch intensities were 6.7 for high-intensity massage and 0.5 for low-intensity (p<0.001). The overall percentage differences (feeling better or worse) following massage were as follows: low intensity, 37.5% better; high intensity, 62.7% better (p<0.001). Significantly more improvement was reported for energy, pain, stress, and feeling physically uptight after high-intensity compared with low-intensity (p<0.03). Participants were more likely to both receive touch for self-care and provide touch for patient care after experiencing high- versus low-intensity massage (p<0.01).>Conclusions: High-intensity seated massage was more efficacious than low-intensity massage and positively influenced nursing student attitudes toward the inclusion of massage in self-care/patient care. The role of touch for self-care/patient care in the nursing curricula merits reconsideration.
机译:>背景:从护理课程中删除按摩后,研究报告称按摩对于减轻压力,放松,缓解疼痛,疲劳和生活质量是安全有效的。>目的:为了比较两次就座按摩过程中两种触摸强度对护理学生自我保健和患者护理态度的影响。>参与者:自愿参加护理工作的护理学生设立了机构审查委员会,批准的书面知情同意书,可以由持牌按摩治疗师进行按摩。>设置/位置:在一所护理学校的护理室旁的一间私人房间。>干预:简短的坐式按摩强度不同。每个参与者以两块,随机顺序,受试者内设计接受低强度和高强度触摸。嵌套在主体和随机截距分析中的线性混合模型用于测试这种两种处理,两个序列,两个周期的交叉设计中的假设。>结果衡量标准:与身体健康相关的健康调查问卷/视觉模拟量表/情感/和态度状态在每次按摩之前和之后都已完成。>结果:有29位参与者(女性为93%,单身为83%)完成了研究。按摩之前,预期自我舒适的最佳触摸强度为6.6(0 =无压力; 10 =可以想象到的最大压力)。高强度按摩的平均触摸强度为6.7,低强度按摩的平均触摸强度为0.5(p <0.001)。按摩后的总体百分比差异(好转或差)如下:低强度,好37.5%;高强度,好62.7%(p <0.001)。与低强度运动相比,高强度运动后的能量,疼痛,压力和身体紧绷感有明显改善(p <0.03)。参加者在进行高强度与低强度按摩后更有可能同时接受自我护理和患者护理服务(p <0.01)。>结论:高强度坐式按摩更有效与低强度按摩相比,对护理学生将按摩纳入自我护理/患者护理中的态度产生了积极影响。值得一提的是,在护理课程中,自我护理/患者护理中接触的作用值得考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号