首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of the American Thoracic Society >Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study ofVeterans Affairs Beneficiaries
【2h】

Variation in Postsepsis Readmission Patterns: A Cohort Study ofVeterans Affairs Beneficiaries

机译:败血症再入院方式的变化:一项队列研究退伍军人事务受益人

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Rationale: Rehospitalization is common after sepsis, but little is known about the variation in readmission patterns across patient groups and care locations.>Objectives: To examine the variation in postsepsis readmission rates and diagnoses by patient age, nursing facility use, admission year, and hospital among U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries.>Methods: Observational cohort study of VA beneficiaries who survived a sepsis hospitalization (2009–2011) at 114 VA hospitals, stratified by age (<65 vs. ≥65 yr), nursing home usage (none, chronic, or acute), year of admission (2009, 2010, 2011), and hospital. In the primary analysis, sepsis hospitalizations were identified using a previously validated method. Sensitivity analyses were performed using alternative definitions with explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes for sepsis, and separately for severe sepsis and septic shock.>Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcomes were rate of 90-day all-cause hospital readmission after sepsis hospitalization and proportion of readmissions resulting from specific diagnoses, including the proportion of “potentially preventable” readmissions. Readmission diagnoses were similar from 2009 to 2011, with little variation in readmissionrates across hospitals. The top six readmission diagnoses (heart failure,pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, acute renal failure, and chronicobstructive pulmonary disease) accounted for 30% of all readmissions. Althoughabout one in five readmissions had a principal diagnosis for infection, 58% ofall readmissions received early systemic antibiotics. Infection accounted for agreater proportion of readmissions among patients discharged to nursingfacilities compared with patients discharged to home (25.0–27.1% vs.16.8%) and among older vs. younger patients (22.2% vs. 15.8%). Potentiallypreventable readmissions accounted for a quarter of readmissions overall andwere more common among older patients and patients discharged to nursingfacilities.>Conclusions: Hospital readmission rates after sepsis were similar bysite and admission year. Heart failure, pneumonia, sepsis, and urinary tractinfection were common readmission diagnoses across all patient groups.Readmission for infection and potentially preventable diagnoses were more commonin older patients and patients discharged to nursing facilities.
机译:>原理:败血症后再次住院很常见,但对于不同患者组和护理地点的再入院方式的变化知之甚少。>目的:检查术后肛门再入院率和通过美国退伍军人事务(VA)受益人的患者年龄,护理设施使用,入院年份和医院进行诊断。>方法:对败血症住院(2009-2011年)幸存的VA受益人进行的观察性队列研究为114 VA医院,按年龄(<65 vs.≥65岁),疗养院使用情况(无,慢性或急性),入院年份(2009、2010、2011)和医院进行分层。在初步分析中,败血症住院治疗是使用先前验证的方法确定的。使用明确的国际疾病分类,第九次修订,临床修改,败血症代码以及严重败血症和败血性休克的单独定义进行敏感性分析。>测量和主要结果:败血症住院后90天全因医院再入院率和因特定诊断而导致的再入院率,包括“潜在可预防”的再入院率。 2009年至2011年的再入院诊断相似,再入院变化不大各个医院的费用。前六名再入院诊断(心力衰竭,肺炎,败血症,尿路感染,急性肾衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺疾病)占所有再入院的30%。虽然大约五分之一的再次入院对感染进行了主要诊断,其中58%所有再入院均接受早期全身性抗生素治疗。感染占一个出院护理的患者中再入院的比例更高设施与出院患者相比(25.0-27.1%vs.16.8%)以及老年患者与年轻患者(22.2%与15.8%)之间。潜在地可预防的再入院占总体再入院的四分之一,在老年患者和出院护理患者中更常见设施。>结论:败血症后医院的再入院率与网站和入学年份。心力衰竭,肺炎,败血症和尿路感染是所有患者组中常见的再入院诊断。再次入院感染和可能预防的诊断更为普遍老年患者和出院到护理机构的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号