首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >Varying but reduced use of postoperative mobilization restrictions after primary total hip arthroplasty in Nordic countries: a questionnaire-based study
【2h】

Varying but reduced use of postoperative mobilization restrictions after primary total hip arthroplasty in Nordic countries: a questionnaire-based study

机译:北欧国家初次全髋关节置换术后术后动员限制的使用量不同但有所减少:一项基于问卷的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose — Mobilization has traditionally been restricted following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an attempt to reduce the risk of dislocation and muscle detachment. However, recent studies have questioned the effect and rationale underlying such restrictions. We investigated the use of postoperative restrictions and possible differences in mobilization protocols following primary THA in Denmark (DK), Finland (FIN), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SWE).Patients and methods — All hospitals performing primary THA in the participating countries were identified from the latest national THA registry report. A questionnaire containing questions regarding standard surgical procedure, use of restrictions, and postoperative mobilization protocol was distributed to all hospitals through national representatives for each arthroplasty registry.Results — 83% to 94% (n = 167) of the 199 hospitals performing THA in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE returned correctly filled out questionnaires. A posterolateral approach was used by 77% of the hospitals. 92% of the hospitals had a standardized mobilization protocol. 50%, 41%, 19%, and 38% of the hospitals in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE, respectively, did not have any postoperative restrictions. If utilized, restrictions were applied for a median of 6 weeks. Two-thirds of all hospitals have changed their mobilization protocol within the last 5 years—all but 2 to a less restrictive protocol.Interpretation — Use of postoperative restrictions following primary THA differs between the Nordic countries, with 19% to 50% allowing mobilization without any restrictions. There has been a strong tendency towards less restrictive mobilization over the last 5 years.
机译:背景与目的—传统上,在全髋关节置换术(THA)之后限制动员,以降低脱位和肌肉脱离的风险。但是,最近的研究对这种限制的作用和原理提出了质疑。我们调查了丹麦(DK),芬兰(FIN),挪威(NO)和瑞典(SWE)进行初次THA术后术后限制的使用以及动员方案可能存在的差异。患者和方法—所有参与初次THA的医院最新的国家THA注册管理机构报告确定了哪些国家/地区。通过国家代表为每个关节置换注册机构向所有医院分发了一份有关标准手术程序,限制使用和术后动员规程问题的问卷。结果-在DK中进行THA的199家医院中,有83%至94%(n = 167) ,FIN,NO和SWE返回正确填写的问卷。 77%的医院采用了后外侧入路。 92%的医院制定了标准化的动员协议。 DK,FIN,NO和SWE的医院中分别有50%,41%,19%和38%的医院没有术后限制。如果使用的话,限制时间为6周。在过去的5年中,所有医院中有三分之二已更改了动员规程-除2医院外,其他都改为限制性较弱的规程。解释-北欧国家在原发性THA后对术后限制的使用有所不同,其中19%至50%的人允许不动员任何限制。在过去的5年中,有一种强烈的趋势,即减少限制动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号