首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Cancer Research >Large hepatocellular carcinoma with local remnants after transarterial chemoembolization: treatment by sorafenib combined with radiofrequency ablation or sorafenib alone
【2h】

Large hepatocellular carcinoma with local remnants after transarterial chemoembolization: treatment by sorafenib combined with radiofrequency ablation or sorafenib alone

机译:经大动脉化疗栓塞后局部残留的大型肝细胞癌:索拉非尼联合射频消融或单用索拉非尼治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aims to investigate retrospectively the efficacy and safety of sorafenib combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat unresectable remnant large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). The 229 consecutive patients with unresectable remnant large HCC (diameter ≥ 5 cm) received RFA and sorafenib (RFA + Sor group, n = 102) or sorafenib (Sor group, n = 127) from January 2010 to January 2016. Complications and overall survival (OS) of the two groups were compared and subgroup analysis carried out. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method. The RFA + Sor group had no additional serious adverse events. The average OS was 18.3 ± 1.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2-21.4) in the RFA + Sor group and 14.1 ± 1.1 months (95% CI: 11.8-16.3) in the Sor group, a difference the log-rank test indicated was significant (P = 0.03). The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of the RFA + Sor group were 56.9%, 34.3%, and 11.7%, and those of the Sor group were 42.5%, 22.0%, and 5.5%, respectively. The between-group differences in 1- and 2-year survival rates were statistically significant, but not the difference in 3-year survival rates. Subgroup analysis showed that the RFA + Sor group achieved significantly more lifetime benefits than the Sor group in: patients with tumors 5-10 cm in diameter (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-1.06 vs. HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.22); patients with an isolated tumor (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.81 vs. HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.55-1.24); and patients with remnant lesion volume < 50% after TACE (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21-1.12 vs. HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.46-0.81). RFA with sorafenib is safe and effective for unresectable remnant large HCC, controlling tumor progression and prolonging survival better than sorafenib alone.
机译:本研究旨在回顾性研究索拉非尼联合射频消融(RFA)治疗经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)后不可切除的残余大肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。从2010年1月至2016年1月,连续229例不可切除的残余大HCC(直径≥5 cm)患者接受RFA和索拉非尼(RFA + Sor组,n = 102)或索拉非尼(Sor组,n = 127)。并发症和总生存比较两组的(OS)并进行亚组分析。使用Kaplan-Meier方法绘制存活曲线。 RFA + Sor组无其他严重不良事件。 RFA + Sor组的平均OS为18.3±1.6个月(95%置信区间[CI]:15.2-21.4),Sor组的平均OS为14.1±1.1个月(95%CI:11.8-16.3),对数差异等级检验显着(P = 0.03)。 RFA + Sor组的1年,2年和3年生存率分别为56.9%,34.3%和11.7%,而Sor组的分别为42.5%,22.0%和5.5%。组间1年和2年生存率差异具有统计学意义,但3年生存率差异无统计学意义。亚组分析显示,RFA + Sor组在以下方面比Sor组获得了更大的终身收益:直径5-10 cm的肿瘤患者(危险比[HR] 0.42,95%CI 0.21-1.06 vs. HR 0.94,95% CI 0.63-1.22);患有孤立性肿瘤的患者(HR 0.36,95%CI 0.19-0.81 vs. HR 0.93,95%CI 0.55-1.24); TACE后残余病变体积<50%的患者(HR 0.47,95%CI 0.21-1.12与HR 0.77,95%CI 0.46-0.81)。 RFA与索拉非尼相比,单独使用索拉非尼对不可切除的残留大肝癌是安全有效的,它可以更好地控制肿瘤进展并延长生存期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号