首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials >The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study
【2h】

The dilemma of widal test - which brand to use? a study of four different widal brands: a cross sectional comparative study

机译:Widal测试的困境-使用哪个品牌?四个不同维塔尔品牌的研究:横截面比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSerodiagnosis of typhoid fever by Widal test based on demonstrating the presence of agglutinins (antibodies) in the serum of an infected patient, against the H (flagellar) and O (somatic) antigens of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi has been associated with many debates. This is why the aim of this study was to: (i) Compare the diagnostic accuracy of four different commercial kits used to perform Widal test (Remel, BioSystems, Dialab and Biotec). (ii) Compare the sensitivity and specificity of both anti-O and anti-H antibodies. (iii) Compare the validity of single versus paired serum samples with a rising titer for the diagnosis of typhoid fever.
机译:背景技术基于证明感染的患者血清中针对肠炎沙门氏菌血清型Typhi的H(鞭毛)和O(体细胞)抗原的凝集素(抗体)的存在,通过Widal试验对伤寒的血清学诊断已经引起了许多争论。因此,本研究的目的在于:(i)比较用于执行Widal测试的四种不同商业套件(Remel,BioSystems,Dialab和Biotec)的诊断准确性。 (ii)比较抗O和抗H抗体的敏感性和特异性。 (iii)比较滴度上升的单一或配对血清样本对伤寒诊断的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号