首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Emergency Medicine >Which treatment for low back pain? A factorial randomised controlled trial comparing intravenous analgesics with oral analgesics in the emergency department and a centrally acting muscle relaxant with placebo over three days ISRCTN09719705
【2h】

Which treatment for low back pain? A factorial randomised controlled trial comparing intravenous analgesics with oral analgesics in the emergency department and a centrally acting muscle relaxant with placebo over three days ISRCTN09719705

机译:下腰痛哪种治疗?一项因果随机对照试验比较了急诊科的静脉镇痛药与口服镇痛药以及安慰剂与中枢性肌肉松弛药在三天内的比较ISRCTN09719705

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAbout two thirds of adults suffer from backpain at some time during their life. In the emergency room many patients with acute back pain are treated with intravenous non-steroidal analgesics. Whether this treatment is superior to oral administration of non-steroidal analgesics is unknown. Intravenous administration, however, requires considerable amounts of resources and accounts for high workload in busy clinics. In the further course centrally acting muscle relaxants are prescribed but the effectiveness remains unclear. The objective of this study is on the one hand to compare the effectiveness of intravenous with oral non-steroidal analgesics for acute treatment and on the other hand to compare the effectiveness of a centrally active muscle relaxant with placebo given for three days after presentation to the ED (emergency department).
机译:背景信息大约三分之二的成年人一生中有时会遭受腰痛。在急诊室,许多患有急性背痛的患者接受了静脉内非甾体类镇痛药的治疗。这种治疗是否优于口服非甾体镇痛药尚不清楚。但是,静脉内给药需要大量资源,并且在繁忙的诊所中占很大的工作量。在进一步的过程中,规定了中央作用的肌肉松弛剂,但是效果尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是一方面比较静脉注射和口服非类固醇镇痛药对急性治疗的有效性,另一方面比较中枢活性肌肉松弛剂和安慰剂的效果,并在给药后三天给予安慰剂。 ED(紧急部门)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号