首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >A prospective multi-method multi-disciplinary multi-level collaborative social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation LP0560737
【2h】

A prospective multi-method multi-disciplinary multi-level collaborative social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation LP0560737

机译:用于研究卫生部门认证的前瞻性多方法多学科多层次协作社会组织的设计LP0560737

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAccreditation has become ubiquitous across the international health care landscape. Award of full accreditation status in health care is viewed, as it is in other sectors, as a valid indicator of high quality organisational performance. However, few studies have empirically demonstrated this assertion. The value of accreditation, therefore, remains uncertain, and this persists as a central legitimacy problem for accreditation providers, policymakers and researchers. The question arises as to how best to research the validity, impact and value of accreditation processes in health care. Most health care organisations participate in some sort of accreditation process and thus it is not possible to study its merits using a randomised controlled strategy. Further, tools and processes for accreditation and organisational performance are multifaceted.
机译:背景技术认证在国际卫生保健领域已经无处不在。如同在其他部门一样,在卫生保健中获得完全认证的地位被视为是高质量组织绩效的有效指标。然而,很少有研究凭经验证明这一主张。因此,认证的价值仍然不确定,对于认证提供者,政策制定者和研究人员而言,这一直是合法性的核心问题。出现了一个问题,即如何最好地研究卫生保健中认证过程的有效性,影响和价值。大多数医疗保健组织都参与某种认证过程,因此不可能使用随机对照策略研究其优点。此外,认证和组织绩效的工具和过程是多方面的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号