首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer
【2h】

Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer

机译:生活质量和家庭肠管喂养:法国前瞻性研究对头颈部或食道癌患者的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre François Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H&N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P< 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. Onethird of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
机译:在法国卡昂的FrançoisBaclesse中心,进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估39例接受头颈部或食道癌治疗的连续肠内饲管对生活质量的影响。患者被当作自己的对照。使用EORTC QLQ-C30核心问卷以及EORTC H&N35和OES24特定问卷来评估生活质量。使用专门为此研究开发的调查表评估喂养技术的耐受性。进行了两次评估,第一次评估是出院后一周(n = 39),第二次评估是在3周后(n = 30)。总体而言,全球健康状况/生活质量量表得分略有改善;在症状中,与便秘,咳嗽,社交功能和身体形象/性有关的量表得分显着改善(P <0.05)。物理喂养技术的耐受性是可以接受的,而在心理上该技术的耐受性较差,三分之二的患者渴望将其取下。三分之一的患者对他们的身体形象也不满意。家庭肠管饲喂导致15%的患者不去探亲或有亲密关系,而23%的患者不公开露面。我们得出的结论是,尽管大部分患者可能会遭受心理困扰,但家庭肠管饲喂是一种物理上公认的技术。 ©2000癌症研究运动

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号