首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Radiology >Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images?
【2h】

Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images?

机译:特定于剂量的剂量估计值:定位器还是腹部腹部CT图像?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To investigate effect of body dimensions obtained from localizer radiograph and transverse abdominal computed tomography (CT) images on Size Specific Dose Estimate.METHODS: This study was approved by Institutional Review Board and was compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Fifty patients with abdominal CT examinations (58 ± 13 years, Male:Female 28:22) were included in this study. Anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral (Lat) diameters were measured at 5 cm intervals from the CT exam localizer radiograph (simple X-ray image acquired for planning the CT exam before starting the scan) and transverse CT images. Average of measured AP and Lat diameters, as well as maximum, minimum and mid location AP and Lat were measured on both image sets. In addition, off centering of patients from the gantry iso-center was calculated from the localizers. Conversion factors from American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) report 204 were obtained for AP, Lat, AP + Lat, and effective diameter (√ AP * Lat) to determine size specific dose estimate (SSDE) from the CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) recorded from the dose reports. Data were analyzed using SPSS v19.RESULTS: Total number of 5376 measurements was done. In some patients entire body circumference was not covered on either projection radiograph or transverse CT images; hence accurate measurement of AP and Lat diameters was not possible in 11% (278/2488) of locations. Forty one patients were off-centered with mean of 1.9 ± 1.8 cm (range: 0.4-7 cm). Conversion factors for attained diameters were not listed on AAPM look-up tables in 3% (80/2488) of measurements. SSDE values were significantly different compared to CTDIvol, ranging from 32% lower to 74% greater than CTDIvol.CONCLUSION: There is underestimation and overestimation of dose comparing SSDE values to CTDIvol. Localizer radiographs are associated with overestimation of patient size and therefore underestimation of SSDE.
机译:目的:研究通过定位器射线照相和腹部横向计算机断层扫描(CT)图像获得的身体尺寸对特定尺寸剂量估计的影响。方法:该研究已通过机构审查委员会的批准,并符合《健康保险携带和责任法案》的要求。本研究纳入了50例接受腹部CT检查的患者(58±13岁,男:女28:22)。从CT检查定位器X射线照片(开始扫描前获取的用于计划CT检查的简单X射线图像)和横向CT图像以5厘米的间隔测量前后(AP)和侧面(Lat)直径。在两个图像集上都测量了平均测得的AP和Lat直径,以及最大,最小和中间位置的AP和Lat。另外,根据定位器计算出患者与龙门架等中心点的偏离中心。从美国物理学家协会(AAPM)报告204中获得了AP,Lat,AP + Lat和有效直径(√AP * Lat)的转换因子,以便根据CT剂量指数体积确定尺寸比剂量估算(SSDE)(剂量报告中记录的CTDIvol)。使用SPSS v19分析数据。结果:完成了5376次测量。在某些患者中,投影X射线照片或横向CT图像均未覆盖整个人体圆周;因此,无法在11%(278/2488)的位置上精确测量AP和纬度直径。 41名患者偏离中心,平均1.9±1.8 cm(范围:0.4-7 cm)。在3%(80/2488)的测量中,AAPM查找表中未列出获得的直径转换系数。与CTDIvol相比,SSDE值存在显着差异,其范围比CTDIvol低32%至74%。结论:与SSDIvol相比,SSDE值被低估或高估了剂量。定位器X射线照片与患者身高估计过高有关,因此对SSDE的估计过低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号