首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?
【2h】

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?

机译:全膝关节置换术中针对患者的仪器。我们应该采用它吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure of paramount relevance that restores a substantial degree of function in arthritic knees. Increased consideration has been given to the influence of limb alignment on longevity after TKA, as errors in component placement can be associated with inferior function and compromised long-term performance. Consequently, numerous studies comparing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) to standard instruments (SI) have been published. Patient-specific approaches use preoperative imaging to create specific materials for each patient's anatomy and were designed to achieve a higher rate of success in TKA, causing the entire procedure to be more efficient and cost-effective. However, it is not clear to what degree these studies support the potential advantages of PSI. Thus, the present study aimed to review the current evidence comparing PSI to SI, concerning alignment, cost-effectiveness, and postoperative functional evaluation.
机译:全膝关节置换术(TKA)是最重要的外科手术方法,可在关节炎的膝盖中恢复相当大的功能。 TKA后肢体对准对寿命的影响已得到越来越多的考虑,因为部件放置的错误可能与功能差和长期表现受损有关。因此,已经发表了许多将患者专用仪器(PSI)与标准仪器(SI)进行比较的研究。特定于患者的方法使用术前成像为每个患者的解剖结构创建特定的材料,并旨在在TKA中获得更高的成功率,从而使整个过程更加有效和具有成本效益。但是,尚不清楚这些研究在多大程度上支持PSI的潜在优势。因此,本研究旨在回顾目前的证据,比较PSI与SI,有关对准,成本效益和术后功能评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号