首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Paediatrics Child Health >COMPLEMENTARY OR DIVERGENT? ACUTE AND LONG-TERM HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS BELIEFS ABOUT PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE
【2h】

COMPLEMENTARY OR DIVERGENT? ACUTE AND LONG-TERM HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS BELIEFS ABOUT PEDIATRIC PALLIATIVE CARE

机译:互补还是分散?关于小儿姑息性护理的急性和长期卫生保健提供者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>BACKGROUND: Continuity of care in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is complex, especially when critical care providers become involved during acute unexpected health events. >OBJECTIVES: To explore and compare acute care and long-term care providers opinions about PPC. >DESIGN/METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted from January to October 2016. Six semi-structured focus groups were held with naturally occurring interdisciplinary carers from pediatric emergency department (ED), pediatric palliative care, pediatric complex care and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Themes emerged with open-ended questions and discussions. Verbatim transcription and thematic analysis were performed with NVivo software. >RESULTS: Fifty-eight participants were enrolled. Figure 1 describes culture specific to each group. Definitions of PPC were overall similar: to provide active complementary care early in the illness trajectory, focusing on caring for the child as a whole and establishing trustful relationships with families. Healthcare providers expected families experiences to follow a linear path, ultimately leading to discussions about end-of-life goals and withholding of aggressive therapies. Each group emphasised their own struggles discussing goals of care (GOC). The inevitability of having to validate previous desires during acute health events was recognised across all groups. However, most acute care providers reported frustrations and discomfort when having to introduce discussions about GOC for the first time in a patients life. Long-term care teams suggested that rapid clinical judgments on patients quality of life by acute care teams are hard to receive by families. Two approaches of PPC were suggested: some healthcare providers hoped to have a full-time designated specialised team to manage patients, while others suggested PPC is a transversal approach to patient care, which should be provided by all. >CONCLUSION: PPC is well recognized and understood by healthcare providers from different specialties. Acute care providers often encounter PPC patients at their worse; continuity of care and quality of interactions with families are challenged by their lack of knowledge about family values and previous discussions on GOC.()
机译:>背景:小儿姑息治疗(PPC)的连续性护理非常复杂,特别是当紧急护理人员在急性意想不到的健康事件中介入护理时。 >目标:探讨并比较急性护理和长期护理提供者对PPC的观点。 >设计/方法:定性研究于2016年1月至10月进行。六个半结构性焦点小组与来自儿科急诊科(ED),儿科姑息治疗,儿科综合治疗的自然跨学科护理人员举行和儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。主题出现了不限成员名额的问题和讨论。使用NVivo软件进行逐字记录和主题分析。 >结果:共有58名参与者参加。图1描述了每个组的特定文化。 PPC的定义总体上是相似的:在疾病轨迹的早期提供积极的补充护理,侧重于照顾整个孩子并建立与家庭的信任关系。医疗保健提供者期望家庭经历遵循线性路径,最终导致有关寿命终了目标的讨论和不采用积极疗法。每个小组都在讨论治疗目标(GOC)时强调自己的努力。所有群体都认识到在急性健康事件中必须验证先前的愿望的必然性。但是,大多数急诊服务提供者在患者生活中首次不得不引入有关GOC的讨论时报告感到沮丧和不适。长期护理小组建议,急诊小组很难对患者的生活质量进行快速的临床判断,这是家庭难以接受的。提出了两种PPC方法:一些医疗保健提供者希望有一个专职的专职团队来管理患者,而另一些人则建议PPC是一种横向护理患者的方法,这应该由所有人提供。 >结论:PPC已被不同专业的医疗保健提供者很好地认可和理解。急性护理提供者经常遇到病情恶化的PPC患者。他们缺乏对家庭价值观的了解以及以前关于GOC的讨论,这给护理的连续性和与家庭的互动质量带来了挑战。()<!-fig ft0-> <!-fig mode = article f1->

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号