首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>One Health >Establishing research priorities to improve the One Health efficacy of Australian general practitioners and veterinarians with regard to zoonoses: A modified Delphi survey
【2h】

Establishing research priorities to improve the One Health efficacy of Australian general practitioners and veterinarians with regard to zoonoses: A modified Delphi survey

机译:确定研究重点以提高澳大利亚全科医生和兽医在人畜共患病方面的一人健康功效:Delphi修改后的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While general medical practitioners (GPs) and veterinarians are often the first line responders in the face of a disease outbreak, pathways to improving the One Health efficacy of these clinicians remain unclear. A two-phase modified Delphi survey of professionals with known expertise in One Health (‘expert panel’) was used to 1) identify key knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAPs) of GPs and veterinarians that would be consistent with a One Health approach to zoonoses; and 2) determine priorities for future surveys with Australian GPs and veterinarians to identify important gaps that impede effective diagnosis and management of zoonoses. A list of 13 topics/sub-topics, as well as a list of 25 specific zoonotic diseases/agents emerged from the first phase of the survey. In the second phase the expert panel identified general knowledge of the clinical aspects and epidemiological aspects of zoonoses, as well as risk management practices, as the most important KAPs and research priorities for both GPs and veterinarians. In terms of diseases, the expert panel regarded knowledge of Hendra virus, Q fever, Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV), anthrax and Brucella suis most important for veterinarians, whilst for GPs, Q fever, gastrointestinal/foodborne diseases, influenza, ABLV and local vector-borne diseases were found to be most important by the expert panel. Some differences were noted in terms of prioritization of topics/sub-topics and diseases/agents according to expert background (veterinary and non-veterinary). The Delphi survey technique enabled efficient collection of data from a diverse range of One Health ‘experts’/specialists and provided clear priorities for proposed future research, and potentially for educational interventions to improve One Health efficacy of clinicians.
机译:尽管面对疾病暴发,普通医生和兽医通常是第一线的响应者,但提高这些临床医生的“一人健康”功效的途径仍不清楚。德尔菲进行了两阶段的,经过修改的德尔菲调查,该调查针对的是拥有单一医疗保健专业知识的专业人员(“专家小组”),用于:1)确定与普通医疗保健方法相一致的全科医生和兽医的关键知识,态度和实践(KAP)。人畜共患病; 2)确定将来与澳大利亚全科医生和兽医进行调查的优先次序,以发现阻碍有效诊断和管理人畜共患病的重要差距。在调查的第一阶段中出现了13个主题/子主题的列表,以及25种特定的人畜共患病/媒介的列表。在第二阶段,专家小组将人畜共患病的临床方面和流行病学方面的常识以及风险管理实践确定为全科医生和兽医的最重要的KAP和研究重点。在疾病方面,专家小组认为,对兽医最重要的是对亨德拉病毒,Q热,澳大利亚蝙蝠狂犬病病毒(ABLV),炭疽和猪布鲁氏菌的了解,而对全科医生而言,Q热,胃肠道/食源性疾病,流感,ABLV和当地专家小组发现,媒介传播疾病是最重要的。在根据专家背景(兽医和非兽医)对主题/子主题和疾病/病原体的优先级排序方面,注意到了一些差异。德尔菲(Delphi)的调查技术可以有效地收集来自多种不同的One Health“专家” /专家的数据,并为未来的拟议研究提供了明确的优先重点,并有可能通过教育干预措施来提高One Health的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号