首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Concurrent myotomy and tunneling after establishment of a half tunnel instead of myotomy after establishment of a full tunnel: a more efficient method of peroral endoscopic myotomy
【2h】

Concurrent myotomy and tunneling after establishment of a half tunnel instead of myotomy after establishment of a full tunnel: a more efficient method of peroral endoscopic myotomy

机译:建立半隧道后同时进行肌切开术和隧道术而不是建立完整隧道后进行肌切开术:一种经口内镜下肌切开术的更有效方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and study aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a time-consuming and challenging procedure. Traditionally, the myotomy is done after the submucosal tunnel has been completed. Starting the myotomy earlier, after submucosal tunneling is half completed (concurrent myotomy and tunneling), may be more efficient. This study aims to assess if the method of concurrent myotomy and tunneling may decrease the procedural time and be efficacious. >Patients and methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent modified POEM (concurrent myotomy and tunneling) or traditional POEM at a tertiary care medical center. Modified POEM or traditional POEM was performed at the discretion of the endoscopist in patients presenting with achalasia. The total procedural duration, myotomy duration, myotomy length, and time per unit length of myotomy were recorded for both modified and traditional POEM. >Results: Modified POEM was performed in 6 patients whose mean age (± standard deviation [SD]) was 58 ± 13.3 years. Of these, 5 patients had type II achalasia and 1 patient had esophageal dysmotility. The mean Eckardt score (± SD) before the procedure was 8.8 ± 1.3. The modified technique was performed in 47 ± 8 minutes, with 6 ± 1 minutes required per centimeter of myotomy and 3 ± 1 minutes required per centimeter of submucosal space. The Eckardt score was 3 ± 1.1 at 1 month and 3 ± 2.5 at 3 months. The procedure time for modified POEM was significantly shorter than that for traditional POEM. >Conclusions: Modified POEM with short submucosal tunneling may be more efficient than traditional POEM with long submucosal tunneling, and outcomes may be equivalent over short-term follow-up. Long-term data and randomized controlled studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of modified POEM with that of the traditional method.
机译:>背景和研究目的:经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是一项耗时且具有挑战性的过程。传统上,在粘膜下通道完成后进行肌切开术。在粘膜下穿刺完成一半(同时进行肌切开和穿刺)后,更早开始肌切开术可能会更有效。这项研究旨在评估同时进行肌切开和隧道穿刺的方法是否可以减少手术时间并有效。 >患者和方法:这是回顾性病例系列,这些患者在三级医疗中心接受了改良POEM(并发肌切开和隧道穿刺)或传统POEM。内镜医师酌情对患有门失弛缓症的患者进行改良的POEM或传统POEM。记录改良的和传统的POEM的总手术时间,肌切开时间,肌切开长度和每单位肌切开时间。 >结果:对6例平均年龄(±标准差[SD])为58±13.3岁的患者进行了改良POEM。其中,5例患有II型门失弛缓症,1例患有食管动力障碍。术前平均Eckardt评分(±SD)为8.8±1.3。改良的技术在47±8分钟内进行,每厘米肌切开术需要6±±1分钟,每厘米粘膜下间隙需要3±±1分钟。 Eckardt评分在1个月时为3±1.1,在3个月时为3±2.5。修改后的POEM的过程时间明显短于传统POEM的过程时间。 >结论:短黏膜下穿刺的改良POEM可能比传统的长黏膜下穿刺的POEM更有效,并且短期随访结果可​​能相同。需要长期数据和随机对照研究,以比较改良POEM与传统方法的临床疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号