首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Journal of Health Science >RD Implementation in a Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology: A Systematic Review Based on Pharmaceutical Companies
【2h】

RD Implementation in a Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology: A Systematic Review Based on Pharmaceutical Companies

机译:实验室医学与病理学系的研发实施:基于制药公司的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A systematic literature review on pharmaceutical companies may be a tool for guiding some procedures of R&D implementation in a department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology. The use of pharmaceutical companies for this specific analysis arises from less variability of standards than healthcare facilities. In this qualitative and quantitative analysis, we focused on three useful areas of implementation, including R&D productivity, commercialization strategies, and expenditures determinants of pharmaceutical companies. Studies and reports of online databases from 1965 to 2014 were reviewed according to specific search terms. Initially, 218 articles and reports were found and examined, but only 91 were considered appropriate and used for further analysis. We identified some suggested implementation strategies relevant for marketing to enhance companies’ own R&D strategies; such as reliability of companies on “sourcing-in” R&D facilities and “think-tank” events. Regardless of the study and of the country, cash flow and profitability always positively influenced R&D expenditure, while sales and firm size did not. We consider that handling R&D determinants should require caution. It seems critical that implementation of R&D systems is directly related with productivity, if it reflects dual embodiment of efficiency and effectiveness. Scrutinizing the determinants of R&D expenditures emphasizes significant factors that are worth to highlight when planning an R&D investment strategy. Although there is no receipt fitting every situation, we think that health care plan makers may find relevant data in this systematic review in creating an initial implementation framework.
机译:有关制药公司的系统文献综述可能是指导实验室医学和病理学部门进行某些R&D程序的工具。制药公司用于此特定分析的原因是,与医疗机构相比,标准的可变性较小。在此定性和定量分析中,我们集中于三个有用的实施领域,包括研发生产率,商业化策略以及制药公司的支出决定因素。根据特定的搜索词,回顾了1965年至2014年的在线数据库研究和报告。最初,发现并检查了218篇文章和报告,但是只有91篇文章和报告被认为适当并用于进一步分析。我们确定了一些与营销相关的建议实施策略,以增强公司自己的研发策略;例如公司在“外包”研发设施和“智囊团”活动上的可靠性。不论进行何种研究和在哪个国家/地区,现金流量和获利能力始终对研发支出产生积极影响,而销售和公司规模却没有。我们认为处理R&D决定因素应谨慎。如果研发系统体现了效率和有效性的双重体现,那么似乎至关重要的是研发系统的实施与生产率直接相关。仔细研究R&D支出的决定因素会强调在计划R&D投资策略时应强调的重要因素。尽管没有适合所有情况的收据,但我们认为医疗保健计划制定者可能会在此系统的审查中找到有关数据,以建立初始实施框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号