首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >Can the Assessment Drives Learning effect be detected in clinical skills training? - Implications for curriculum design and resource planning
【2h】

Can the Assessment Drives Learning effect be detected in clinical skills training? - Implications for curriculum design and resource planning

机译:在临床技能培训中能否检测到评估驱动学习效果? -对课程设计和资源规划的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: The acquisition of clinical-technical skills is of particular importance for the doctors of tomorrow. Procedural skills are often trained for the first time in skills laboratories, which provide a sheltered learning environment. However, costs to implement and maintain skills laboratories are considerably high. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate students’ patterns of attendance of voluntary skills-lab training sessions and thereby answer the following question: Is it possible to measure an effect of the theoretical construct related to motivational psychology described in the literature – ‘Assessment drives learning’ – reflected in patterns of attendance at voluntary skills-lab training sessions? By answering this question, design recommendations for curriculum planning and resource management should be derived.>Method: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of student skills-lab attendance related to voluntary basic and voluntary advanced skills-lab sessions was conducted. The attendance patterns of a total of 340 third-year medical students in different successive year groups from the Medical Faculty at the University of Heidelberg were assessed.>Results: Students showed a preference for voluntary basic skills-lab training sessions, which were relevant to clinical skills assessment, especially at the beginning and at the end of the term. Voluntary advanced skills-lab training sessions without reference to clinical skills assessment were used especially at the beginning of the term, but declined towards the end of term.>Conclusion: The results show a clear influence of assessments on students’ attendance at skills-lab training sessions. First recommendations for curriculum design and resource management will be described. Nevertheless, further prospective research studies will be necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the motivational factors impacting students’ utilisation of voluntary skills-lab training in order to reach a sufficient concordance between students’ requirements and faculty offers, as well as resource management.
机译:>目的:对于明天的医生而言,掌握临床技术技能尤为重要。程序技能通常是在技能实验室中首次接受培训的,该实验室提供了一个隐蔽的学习环境。但是,实施和维护技能实验室的成本相当高。因此,本研究的目的是调查学生参加自愿技能实验室培训课程的方式,从而回答以下问题:是否有可能测量文献中描述的与动机心理学有关的理论建构的影响? “评估推动学习” –反映在参加自愿技能实验室培训课程的方式上吗?通过回答此问题,应得出课程计划和资源管理的设计建议。>方法:对与自愿性基本技能和自愿性高级技能实验有关的学生技能实验出勤率进行了回顾性,描述性分析。 。评估了海德堡大学医学院不同连续年级的340名三年级医学生的出勤方式。>结果:学生表现出对自愿性基本技能实验室培训的偏好与临床技能评估有关的课程,特别是在学期开始和结束时。 >结论:结果表明,评估对学生有明显的影响,特别是在学期开始时使用了自愿性的高级技能实验室培训课程,没有参考临床技能评估。参加技能实验室培训课程。将描述课程设计和资源管理的第一个建议。尽管如此,仍需要进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以便更全面地了解影响学生利用自愿技能实验室培训的动机因素,以便在学生的需求与教职人员以及资源管理之间取得足够的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号