首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Services Research >Medical effectiveness in Canadian and U.S. health policy: the comparative politics of inferential ambiguity.
【2h】

Medical effectiveness in Canadian and U.S. health policy: the comparative politics of inferential ambiguity.

机译:加拿大和美国卫生政策中的医疗效力:推论性歧义的比较政治。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare Canadian and U.S. policymaking to determine how different health care systems may use health services research differently in responding to the common problem of ineffective medical care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The United States and Canada are making surprisingly divergent responses to the problem of medical ineffectiveness: reinforcement of the solidarity principle and deprivatization in Canada, and reinforcement of market competition and privatization in the United States. In doing so, Canadian policymakers overstate the societal applicability and U.S. policymakers the individual applicability of outcomes research findings. CONCLUSIONS: Probabilistic findings of medical effectiveness are fundamentally ambiguous as they relate to action. They therefore invite divergent policy responses from different policy regimes. Health services researchers must not imagine that research findings are sufficient to determine the course of health policy.
机译:目的:比较加拿大和美国的政策制定方法,以确定不同的医疗保健系统在应对无效医疗保健这一普遍问题时如何不同地使用医疗服务研究。数据源/研究设计/数据收集:不适用。主要结论:美国和加拿大对医疗效率低下的问题出人意料地产生了分歧:加强团结原则和加拿大的私有化,以及加强美国的市场竞争和私有化。这样一来,加拿大的决策者就夸大了社会适用性,而美国的决策者则对结果研究结果的个人适用性进行了夸大。结论:医学有效性的概率发现从根本上是模棱两可的,因为它们与行动有关。因此,它们邀请不同的政策体系采取不同的政策应对措施。卫生服务研究人员不得以为研究结果足以确定卫生政策的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号