首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heart Lung and Vessels >Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints
【2h】

Meta-analysis: pitfalls and hints

机译:荟萃分析:陷阱和提示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present work is an overview of the main pitfalls which may occur when a researcher performs a meta-analysis. The main goal is to help clinicians evaluate published research results. Organizing and carrying out a meta-analysis is hard work, but the findings can be significant. Meta-analysis is a powerful tool to cumulate and summarize the knowledge in a research field, and to identify the overall measure of a treatment’s effect by combining several conclusions. However, it is a controversial tool, because even small violations of  certain rules can lead to misleading conclusions. In fact, several decisions made when designing and performing a meta-analysis require personal judgment and expertise, thus creating personal biases or expectations that may influence the result. Meta-analysis’ conclusions should be interpreted in the light of various checks, discussed in this work, which can inform the readers of the likely reliability of the conclusions. Specifically, we explore the principal steps (from writing a prospective protocol of analysis to results’ interpretation) in order to minimize the risk of conducting a mediocre meta-analysis and to support researchers to accurately evaluate the published findings.
机译:本文是对研究人员进行荟萃分析时可能出现的主要陷阱的概述。主要目标是帮助临床医生评估已发表的研究结果。组织和进行荟萃分析是一项艰巨的工作,但发现可能很重要。荟萃分析是一种强大的工具,可用于汇总和总结研究领域的知识,并结合多个结论来确定治疗效果的总体衡量标准。但是,这是一个有争议的工具,因为即使对某些规则的微小违反也会导致误导性结论。实际上,在设计和执行荟萃分析时做出的一些决定需要个人判断和专业知识,因此会产生可能影响结果的个人偏见或期望。荟萃分析的结论应根据本文中讨论的各种检查加以解释,这些检查可以使读者了解结论的可能可靠性。具体来说,我们探索主要步骤(从编写前瞻性分析方案到结果解释),以最大程度地减少进行中等水平的荟萃分析的风险,并支持研究人员准确评估已发表的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号