首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Industrial Health >Evaluation of ergonomic physical risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant:case study in SCANIA Production Angers
【2h】

Evaluation of ergonomic physical risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant:case study in SCANIA Production Angers

机译:评估卡车制造工厂中的人体工程学物理危险因素:斯堪尼亚生产愤怒案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aims of this study were 1) to assess the ergonomic physical risk factors from practitioner’s viewpoint in a truck assembly plant with an in-house observational method and the NIOSH lifting equation, and 2) to compare the results of both methods and their differences. The in-house ergonomic observational method for truck assembly i.e. the SCANIA Ergonomics Standard (SES) and the NIOSH lifting equation were applied to evaluate physical risk factors and lifting of loads by operators. Both risk assessment approaches revealed various levels of risk, ranging from low to high. Two workstations were identified by the SES method as high risk. The NIOSH lifting index (LI) was greater than two for four lifting tasks. The results of the SES method disagreed with the NIOSH lifting equation for lifting tasks. Moreover, meaningful variations in ergonomic risk patterns were found for various truck models at each workstation. These results provide a better understanding of the physical ergonomic exposure from practitioner’s point of view in the automotive assembly plant.
机译:这项研究的目的是:1)使用内部观察方法和NIOSH提升方程从卡车装配厂的从业者角度评估人体工程学的物理危险因素,以及2)比较两种方法的结果及其差异。卡车装配的内部人体工程学观察方法,即SCANIA人体工程学标准(SES)和NIOSH提升方程,被用于评估操作员的物理危险因素和负荷提升。两种风险评估方法都揭示了各种风险级别,范围从低到高。通过SES方法将两个工作站确定为高风险。对于四个提升任务,NIOSH提升指数(LI)大于2。 SES方法的结果与NIOSH提升任务的提升方程不同。此外,在每个工作站的各种卡车型号中,都发现了人体工程学风险模式的有意义的变化。这些结果从汽车组装厂的从业人员的角度更好地了解了人体工学方面的物理暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号