首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease treated in different therapy units at department of cardiology: a retrospective cohort study
【2h】

Prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease treated in different therapy units at department of cardiology: a retrospective cohort study

机译:心脏科不同治疗单位治疗的冠心病患者的预后:一项回顾性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major health problem in global. Benefit from different care unit for various type of CAD is remaining unknown. We investigate if coronary care unit (CCU) reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Method: 806 CAD patients including stable angina (SA) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who treated in department of cardiology were involved in the study as two groups. Each group involved two subgroups according to the therapy unit including CCU and normal unit. 12-48 months follow-up was carried out. The primary end point was all cause mortality. Results: For SA, death from any cause occurred in 1.0% of the patients in the normal group (1 of 108), as compared with 5.1% in the CCU group (3 of 59) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.164; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.017 to 1.580; P=0.118). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the two subgroups with respect to the risk of death (P=0.074), revascularization (P=0.660), stroke (P=0.497), heart failure (P=0.658) and hemorrhage (P=0.096). For ACS, death occurred in 1.9% of the patients in the normal subgroup (5 of 267), as compared with 1.3% in the CCU subgroup (5 of 372) (HR, 1.403; 95% CI, 0.406-4.846; P=0.593). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the two subgroups with respect to the risk of death (P=0.591), revascularization (P=0.996), stroke (P=0.425), heart failure (P=0.625). Conclusion: CAD patients treated in CCU obtain little benefits compared with normal.
机译:背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是全球范围内的主要健康问题。对于各种类型的CAD,从不同的护理单位获得的收益仍然未知。我们调查了冠心病监护单位(CCU)是否可以降低主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生率。方法:将806名包括稳定型心绞痛(SA)和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)在内的CAD患者在心脏病科接受治疗,分为两组。根据治疗单位,每组分为两个亚组,包括CCU和正常单位。进行了12-48个月的随访。主要终点均为原因死亡。结果:对于SA而言,正常组(108名中的1名)的患者死于任何原因的比例为1.0%,而CCU组(59名中的3名)的比例为5.1%(危险比[HR],0.164; 95) %置信区间[CI],0.017至1.580; P = 0.118)。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,在死亡风险(P = 0.074),血运重建(P = 0.660),中风(P = 0.497),心力衰竭(P = 0.658)方面,两个亚组之间没有显着差异。和出血(P = 0.096)。对于ACS,正常亚组(267名中的5名)中有1.9%的患者发生死亡,而CCU亚组(372名中的5名)中有1.3%的患者死亡(HR,1.403; 95%CI,0.406-4.846; P = 0.593)。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,在死亡风险(P = 0.591),血运重建(P = 0.996),中风(P = 0.425),心力衰竭(P = 0.625)方面,两个亚组之间没有显着差异。 。结论:在CCU中治疗的CAD患者与正常人相比获益甚微。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号