“冬病夏治”单一疗法和综合疗法治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病疗效对比观察

摘要

[Objective] To compare mono-therapy with combination therapy in treating winter diseases in summer. [Methods] Choose 478 chronic respiratory disease patients applied combination therapy or mono-therapy. Combination therapy refers to a method combining drug therapy,acupoint application, and otopoint massage. Mono-therapy refers to a method using point application alone. Then compare the effects of each group, and make fol ow-up observation. [Results] In treating winter diseases in summer, the combination therapy improved obviously for the patients with chronic respireatory diseases. There was significant differences( P<0.05) between the two groups. Especial y for bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic laryngitis, al ergic rhinitis, the efficacy of combination therapy was better than the mono-therapy, and there was significant difference( P<0.05) between the two groups.[Conclusions] The therapeutic effect of combination therapy is superior than the mono-therapy in treating and control ing chronic respiratory diseases.%[目的]对比“冬病夏治”单一疗法和综合疗法治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病的疗效。[方法]478例支气管哮喘、慢性支气管炎、慢性咽喉炎、过敏性鼻炎、慢支伴肺气肿的患者，在“三伏天”以中药内服、外用穴位敷贴及耳穴按压相结合的综合疗法和单一使用穴位敷贴的单一疗法疗效做对比，并作随访观察，最后对随访结果进行分析。[结果]慢性呼吸系统疾病患者采用“冬病夏治”综合疗法治疗，较单一治疗明显改善，两组疗效比较有统计学差异（P<0.05），特别是针对支气管哮喘、慢性支气管炎、慢性咽喉炎、过敏性鼻炎的治疗，综合疗法组较单一疗法组明显改善，两组间比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）。[结论]“冬病夏治”综合疗法控制和治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病效果明显。